2020
DOI: 10.1214/19-ba1166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gibbs-type Indian Buffet Processes

Abstract: We investigate a class of feature allocation models that generalize the Indian buffet process and are parameterized by Gibbs-type random measures. Two existing classes are contained as special cases: the original two-parameter Indian buffet process, corresponding to the Dirichlet process, and the stable (or three-parameter) Indian buffet process, corresponding to the Pitman-Yor process. Asymptotic behavior of the Gibbs-type partitions, such as power laws holding for the number of latent clusters, translates in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its widespread popularity is due to its power to generate a binary matrix with infinite columns. Restricted IBP [27] is proposed to allow an arbitrary prior distribution rather than a fixed Poisson distribution form for the number of features in each observation; Integrative IBP [28] is developed for integrating multimodal data in a latent space; Gibbs-type IBP [29] is a generalization of IBP with two-parameter IBP and three-parameter IBP [30] as special cases. All these models provide extensions for the original IBP to endow it with new meaningful features, e.g., power-law behavior.…”
Section: B Ibp and Dibpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its widespread popularity is due to its power to generate a binary matrix with infinite columns. Restricted IBP [27] is proposed to allow an arbitrary prior distribution rather than a fixed Poisson distribution form for the number of features in each observation; Integrative IBP [28] is developed for integrating multimodal data in a latent space; Gibbs-type IBP [29] is a generalization of IBP with two-parameter IBP and three-parameter IBP [30] as special cases. All these models provide extensions for the original IBP to endow it with new meaningful features, e.g., power-law behavior.…”
Section: B Ibp and Dibpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SB-IBP exhibits a number of power-law behaviors [Teh and Görür, 2009, Broderick et al, 2012, Heaukulani and Roy, 2018. First, the total number of non-zero columns of Z (in our case, observed vertices) in N rows (cliques) follows a power law, growing, as N → ∞, as…”
Section: Random Cliques Generated Using Exchangeable Random Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a direct consequence of the power-law behavior of the SB-IBP: the number of vertices in a graph with N generating cliques correspond to the number of non-zero columns in a sample from the SB-IBP with N rows. Broderick et al [2012] and Heaukulani and Roy [2018] show that the expected number of non-zero columns grows as α σ…”
Section: Sparsitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalized CUSP prior subsumes several specific priors involving stickbreaking representations from beta distributions that were introduced earlier in the literature for factor-analytical models, see e.g. [9,15,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%