1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02648369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gibbs-duhem-margules laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore it is not surprising when Haase [17] (p. 360) showed that the polynomial nowadays ascribed to Redlich and Kister is completely identical with the conventional ansatz of Margules. The same was later underlined by others ( [7], p. 225; [18]). This very fact throws a questionable light on the authorship of Redlich and Kister.…”
Section: Practical Consequencessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore it is not surprising when Haase [17] (p. 360) showed that the polynomial nowadays ascribed to Redlich and Kister is completely identical with the conventional ansatz of Margules. The same was later underlined by others ( [7], p. 225; [18]). This very fact throws a questionable light on the authorship of Redlich and Kister.…”
Section: Practical Consequencessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In a binary system, the only requirement for a thermodynamically sound activity coefficient model is satisfying the Duhem-Margules relation (Eq. 11), which implies conformance with the more familiar Gibbs-Duhem relation (Margules, 1895;McGlashan, 1963;Gokcen, 1996);…”
Section: Bat Activity Coefficient Modelsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…0 produced by the set of solvent molecules which are in surface-contact with the reactants and products. Then, the Margules equations [19] suggest ln(g solute ) = x(x solvent ) 2 ( Figure S6a in the Supporting Information), which leads to the solute activity a solute ¼ g solute The molecular interpretation of the latter DG S exch contribution is difficult and challenging, which probably explains the so far limited impact produced by the report of Equation (6) in 2013.…”
Section: Exchange Of Neutral [La(hfa) 3 ]G Uest Betweendiglyme and L1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4)) for each different mixture along the titration.T he physicalo rigin of this effect, often neglected in biology and in coordination chemistry, [18] can be traced back to the regular solutiont heory of binary mixtures, in which Margules equations [19] predict that the activity coefficients of the solute obeys ln(g solute ) = x(x solvent ) 2 ,w here x solvent is the solvent mole fraction and x is ad imensionlessp arameter that is a measureo ft he energy of solute-solvent interactions relative to solute-solute and solvent-solvent interactions. (4)) for each different mixture along the titration.T he physicalo rigin of this effect, often neglected in biology and in coordination chemistry, [18] can be traced back to the regular solutiont heory of binary mixtures, in which Margules equations [19] predict that the activity coefficients of the solute obeys ln(g solute ) = x(x solvent ) 2 ,w here x solvent is the solvent mole fraction and x is ad imensionlessp arameter that is a measureo ft he energy of solute-solvent interactions relative to solute-solute and solvent-solvent interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%