2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant resonances — experiments at highest resolution, wavelets and scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the existing measurements were performed using low-resolution gamma-ray detectors. Although the presence of a fine structure superimposed on the broad bump of the ISGQR in 208 Pb has been [32,33]. Different techniques have been used to extract the energy scales associated to the fine structure, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the existing measurements were performed using low-resolution gamma-ray detectors. Although the presence of a fine structure superimposed on the broad bump of the ISGQR in 208 Pb has been [32,33]. Different techniques have been used to extract the energy scales associated to the fine structure, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of a fine structure superimposed on the broad bump of the ISGQR in 208 Pb has been [32,33]. Different techniques have been used to extract the energy scales associated to the fine structure, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Comparison with second-RPA calculations indicates that the energy scales can indeed arise from the first step of the damping mechanism, that is the coupling of the 1p-1h states to the 2p-2h states (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If only "significant" scales are included in this reconstruction, an assessment of their significance can be made [25]. For instance, However, reproduction with scales that would seem to be less significant (A 8 + D 6 + D 2 + D 1 ) leads to much larger errors, as shown in the bottom right-hand panel.…”
Section: E Discrete Wavelet Analysis: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%