2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03409-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant mediastinal chordoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extra-axial–skeletal primary cases of the ulna, tibia, femur, and pubic bone have been reported [7] , [8] , [9] . Although extra-skeletal primary cases are exceptionally rare, they have been reported to occur in a wide variety of locations, including the toes, fingers, buttocks, chest wall, shoulders, thighs, hands, wrist joints, nasopharynx, and posterior mediastinum [7] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] . No other reports on extra-skeletal chordomas originating in the gastrointestinal wall have been previously published in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extra-axial–skeletal primary cases of the ulna, tibia, femur, and pubic bone have been reported [7] , [8] , [9] . Although extra-skeletal primary cases are exceptionally rare, they have been reported to occur in a wide variety of locations, including the toes, fingers, buttocks, chest wall, shoulders, thighs, hands, wrist joints, nasopharynx, and posterior mediastinum [7] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] . No other reports on extra-skeletal chordomas originating in the gastrointestinal wall have been previously published in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass in this case did not show any evidence of differentiation, thus the diagnosis was chordoma not otherwise specified. Its strong tendency to recur at surgical sites and the fair chance of refractory behavior to therapeutic modalities (radiation, systemic agents) may prove lethal [4]. Thoracic chordoma pre- Vertebral body destruction may be evident radiographically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%