2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-012-4810-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant magnetostrictive materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetostrictive materials can generate strain in response to excitation with magnetic field. Pure elements such as cobalt and nickel and alloys such as Terfenol‐D, (Ter for terbium, Fe for iron, NOL for Naval Ordnance Laboratory, and D for dysprosium), amorphous alloy Fe 81 Si 3.5 B 13.5 C 2 (under trade mark of Metglas 2605 SC), iron–aluminum alloy (from Alperm family), gallium–iron alloy (Galfenol), and 2V‐Permendur (i.e., a cobalt–iron alloy containing 2% vanadium (Fe 0.49 Co 0.49 V 0.02 )) are among the materials that exhibit magnetostrictive behavior. Owing to its great performance, Terfenol‐D (Tb x Dy 1− x Fe 2 with x ≈ 0.3) is the most industrially applied magnetostrictive material and can generate strains up to 0.2–0.24% under magnetic field of 40 kA m −1 and stress of 20 MPa with bandwidths up to 20 kHz .…”
Section: Artificial Muscles: Working Mechanism Properties and Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetostrictive materials can generate strain in response to excitation with magnetic field. Pure elements such as cobalt and nickel and alloys such as Terfenol‐D, (Ter for terbium, Fe for iron, NOL for Naval Ordnance Laboratory, and D for dysprosium), amorphous alloy Fe 81 Si 3.5 B 13.5 C 2 (under trade mark of Metglas 2605 SC), iron–aluminum alloy (from Alperm family), gallium–iron alloy (Galfenol), and 2V‐Permendur (i.e., a cobalt–iron alloy containing 2% vanadium (Fe 0.49 Co 0.49 V 0.02 )) are among the materials that exhibit magnetostrictive behavior. Owing to its great performance, Terfenol‐D (Tb x Dy 1− x Fe 2 with x ≈ 0.3) is the most industrially applied magnetostrictive material and can generate strains up to 0.2–0.24% under magnetic field of 40 kA m −1 and stress of 20 MPa with bandwidths up to 20 kHz .…”
Section: Artificial Muscles: Working Mechanism Properties and Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to ferroelectric MPBs, the already reported Tb 1Àx Dy x Co 2 6 and Tb 1Àx Dy x Fe 2 7 systems also show the flattened free energy landscape, which results in the coexistence of two low-symmetry phases and the significantly enhanced fieldinduced strain at MPB. Consequently, this offers a magnetostructural origin for the well-known Terfenol-D giant magnetostrictive materials (GMMs) with compositions near MPB (typically, Tb 0.3 Dy 0.7 Fe 2 ) , [9][10][11][12] which can generate high magnetostriction at low switching fields. MPB in Tb 1Àx Dy x Fe 2 was previously known as a "spin-orientation transition" that has been explained by single-ion theory, 10 but how maximum magnetostriction appears is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6(c) ~ 6(g), the sensor performance is different for each calibration, this is because the sensor performance differs as not only the Possion's ratio [18] of GMM but also the thickness, width, length of the adhesive [19] which all relate to strain transfer between GMM and FBG. Figure 7 shows the performance of GMM [20] along its major magnetostriction direction, with external magnetic field increasing, the major magnetostriction direction of GMM elongates while its length-direction gets compressed which meets the performance of the magnetic field sensor. The average calibration curve is calculated by the 3 rd~1 0 th calibration curves in Fig.…”
Section: Fbg-gmm Sensor's Static Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 89%