1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(94)90136-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant magnetoresistance and interlayer exchange coupling in Ni-Co/Cu multilayer films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 indicate the approximate positions of the first three GMR maxima observed for sputtered fcc(111) Co/Cu multilayers. 5,56,57 The clear absence of an oscillatory GMR behaviour can be established for the present electrodeposited Co/Cu multilayers. Especially, there are no distinct features in the GMR magnitude at the usual positions of the AF maxima in the oscillatory interlayer exchange coupling.…”
Section: B Magnetoresistancesupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 indicate the approximate positions of the first three GMR maxima observed for sputtered fcc(111) Co/Cu multilayers. 5,56,57 The clear absence of an oscillatory GMR behaviour can be established for the present electrodeposited Co/Cu multilayers. Especially, there are no distinct features in the GMR magnitude at the usual positions of the AF maxima in the oscillatory interlayer exchange coupling.…”
Section: B Magnetoresistancesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…By contrast, for physically deposited multilayers MR saturation against the AF-coupling can usually be achieved well below 10 kOe even at the first AF maximum (spacer thickness around 1 nm), whereas at the second and third AF maximum the saturation field is of the order of a few hundred oersted only. 5,57,61 In order to understand the origin of such a difference, we consider first the classical magnetic/non-magnetic multilayers in which the magnetic layers contain FM regions only (most multilayers produced by physical deposition methods exhibit this behaviour). In such cases, the GMR effect arises from spin-dependent scattering originating from electron paths of the type "FM region 1  NM region  FM region 2" and this is the conventional GMR FM term observed in physically deposited multilayers [1][2][3][4][5] which saturates at the above mentioned magnetic fields.…”
Section: A Ferromagnetic and Superparamagnetic Contributions To The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, in the two series labeled as (1)(2)(3)(4) and (51)(52)(53)(54)(55), the addition of a small amount of Ag + ions to the bath resulted definitely in an improvement of the GMR magnitude. For further additions of Ag + ions to the bath (typically with concentrations above 1%), the GMR magnitude showed an overall decrease down to very small GMR values for the highest Ag + ion concentrations applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be an explanation for the relatively easy formation of very thin (1 nm or less) and still continuous Cu layers between Co layers in sputtered Co/Cu multilayers, which then enable the development of an oscillatory exchange coupling via the NM spacer and the associated oscillatory GMR. [2][3][4] For other techniques allowing an equilibration of the atoms being deposited, alternative routes are required to achieve a layer-by-layer growth and the formation of better interfaces.…”
Section: D332mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation