1987
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90668-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant invasive prolactinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A tumour size criterion is universally recognized (6,7,8,11,12,13,14,15) and is important as giant prolactinomas will cause specific complications related to invasion of the dura, the subarachnoid space, the clivus, the nasopharyngeal space, internal auditory canals and surrounding brain structures. Thus, such tumours are more aggressive and usually not completely resectable.…”
Section: Definition and Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A tumour size criterion is universally recognized (6,7,8,11,12,13,14,15) and is important as giant prolactinomas will cause specific complications related to invasion of the dura, the subarachnoid space, the clivus, the nasopharyngeal space, internal auditory canals and surrounding brain structures. Thus, such tumours are more aggressive and usually not completely resectable.…”
Section: Definition and Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As serum hormone levels generally parallel tumour size, giant prolactinomas are typically associated with very high PRL concentrations, above 1000 mg/l (21 000 mU/l) (4,15,21). While most non-surgical series published in the literature indeed used this criterion of 1000 mg/l (7,12,15,20,22,23,24), higher cut-off levels of 2000 mg/l (25), 3000 mg/l (8) or even 4000 mg/l (11) have also been used. At the opposite, lower and more conservative PRL thresholds of 200 or 250 mg/l, similar to those used for non-giant macroprolactinomas, have also been proposed previously (6,26), although assay problems were mentioned in the latter report and accurate PRL concentrations were not available in some cases.…”
Section: Definition and Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations