2007
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant claw reveals the largest ever arthropod

Abstract: The fossil record has yielded various gigantic arthropods, in contrast to their diminutive proportions today. The recent discovery of a 46 cm long claw (chelicera) of the pterygotid eurypterid (‘sea scorpion’) Jaekelopterus rhenaniae , from the Early Devonian Willwerath Lagerstätte of Germany, reveals that this form attained a body length of approximately 2.5 m—almost half a metre longer than previous estimates of the group, and the largest arthropod ever to have evolved. Gigantism in L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
75
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Basal taxa in both suborders are relatively small, and more derived taxa tend to increase in size. This trend has been noted specifically in pterygotids (Braddy et al 2008a), with an increase in length of 1250 per cent, and hibbertopteroids (Lamsdell et al 2009), with an increase in length of 823 per cent. In this respect, both hibbertopteroids and pterygotids obey Cope's Rule or 'phyletic gigantism' (Gould & MacFadden 2004), yet clearly occupied different life habits; the pterygotids were nektonic predators capable of excursions into the open marine realm, while the hibbertopteroids were benthic sweep-feeders limited to freshwater environments from the Late Devonian until their extinction.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Gigantism and Cope's Rulementioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Basal taxa in both suborders are relatively small, and more derived taxa tend to increase in size. This trend has been noted specifically in pterygotids (Braddy et al 2008a), with an increase in length of 1250 per cent, and hibbertopteroids (Lamsdell et al 2009), with an increase in length of 823 per cent. In this respect, both hibbertopteroids and pterygotids obey Cope's Rule or 'phyletic gigantism' (Gould & MacFadden 2004), yet clearly occupied different life habits; the pterygotids were nektonic predators capable of excursions into the open marine realm, while the hibbertopteroids were benthic sweep-feeders limited to freshwater environments from the Late Devonian until their extinction.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Gigantism and Cope's Rulementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Intrinsic factors including mechanical properties of their exoskeleton and respiratory system limit maximum arthropod size, especially on land. Pterygotids had a thin, unmineralized cuticle and could attain such large size because of their light-weight construction and aquatic lifestyle (Braddy et al 2008a). Hibbertopterids adopted a more graviportal approach; their cuticle is considerably thicker and they have other adaptations linked to supporting a large body size, including grooves on the podomeres of their loadbearing legs and tubercles or ridges interpreted as muscle attachment sites on the opisthosoma, aiding the function of respiratory organs (Lamsdell et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussion (A) Gigantism and Cope's Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eurypteroids were active, predaceous, benthonic animals occupying all aquatic environments and commonly reached a size of 10 -20 cm [12], although giant forms of two or more meters in length are known [13]. Eurypteroids had claw-shaped chelicerae that served for catching and crushing prey, and several pairs of oar-shaped appendages served for swimming.…”
Section: Arthropodamentioning
confidence: 99%