2015
DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant Cell Tumor of the Uterus

Abstract: Giant cell tumors, a well-recognized neoplasm of bone, can rarely be found in the uterus. Such tumors are characterized by a dual population of mononuclear and osteoclast-like giant cells that lack epithelial and specific mesenchymal differentiation. In this study, the clinicopathologic features of 3 giant cell tumors of the uterus were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry for CD68, CD163, h-caldesmon, desmin, SMA, AE1/AE3, CD10, ER, PR, cyclin D1, CD1a, CD34, CD30, S100, myogenin/myoglobin, and Ki-67 was performed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 The tumor is considered epithelial if the background cells stain positive to keratin (Cytokeratin AE1/AE3) or epithelial membrane antigen and when they are positive for mesenchymal markers (h-caldesmon, myogenin or DOG1), the tumor is categorized as mesenchymal. 8 In this present case, stain were negative for all markers, except for those with histiocytic differentiation (CD68), being more consistent with the diagnosis of a malignant giant cell tumor. 8,10 In summary, the immunohistochemistry can be heterogeneous, depending on the tumor grade, the malignant potential, and whether neoplasm contains two or more histological components.…”
Section: Pathologysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…12,13 The tumor is considered epithelial if the background cells stain positive to keratin (Cytokeratin AE1/AE3) or epithelial membrane antigen and when they are positive for mesenchymal markers (h-caldesmon, myogenin or DOG1), the tumor is categorized as mesenchymal. 8 In this present case, stain were negative for all markers, except for those with histiocytic differentiation (CD68), being more consistent with the diagnosis of a malignant giant cell tumor. 8,10 In summary, the immunohistochemistry can be heterogeneous, depending on the tumor grade, the malignant potential, and whether neoplasm contains two or more histological components.…”
Section: Pathologysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…8 In this present case, stain were negative for all markers, except for those with histiocytic differentiation (CD68), being more consistent with the diagnosis of a malignant giant cell tumor. 8,10 In summary, the immunohistochemistry can be heterogeneous, depending on the tumor grade, the malignant potential, and whether neoplasm contains two or more histological components. CD68 usually stains the mononuclear and osteoclastlike cells, CD10 usually shows strong membranous staining for both cell types and cytoplasmic staining in the mononuclear cells, and Cycline D1 is positive in the nuclei of the osteoclast-like giant cells.…”
Section: Pathologysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tissue was washed in sodium cacodylate buffer, fixed in modified Karnovsky fixative, processed (Lynx tissue processor, Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA), embedded in epoxy resin, cut into thin sections, stained, and examined (Morgagni TEM, FEI, Hillsboro, OR) as described previously. 4 Icosahedral viral particles with capsids were noted in necrotic nuclear and cellular debris (Fig. 1C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%