2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1057917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant cell arteritis: A population-based retrospective cohort study exploring incidence and clinical presentation in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand

Abstract: Background/aimTo determine the epidemiology and clinical features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand, with a particular focus on extra-cranial large vessel disease.MethodsPatients with GCA were identified from radiology and pathology reports, outpatient letters and inpatient hospital admissions in the Canterbury New Zealand from 1 June 2011 to 31 May 2016. Data was collected retrospectively based on review of electronic medical records.ResultsThere were 142 cases of GCA identifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though headache was significantly more common in patients with cranial and unclassifiable phenotype, more than 50% of patients with non-cranial phenotype also had new localized headache. Some other studies have reported similar findings ( 10 , 29 , 30 ). Constitutional symptoms were more common in non-cranial and mixed phenotype, with borderline significance (depending on method of multiple-testing correction).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though headache was significantly more common in patients with cranial and unclassifiable phenotype, more than 50% of patients with non-cranial phenotype also had new localized headache. Some other studies have reported similar findings ( 10 , 29 , 30 ). Constitutional symptoms were more common in non-cranial and mixed phenotype, with borderline significance (depending on method of multiple-testing correction).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A major difference between these studies and our study is the study design, with the possibility of missing imaging data for some patients in our study causing a possible underestimation of non-cranial involvement. A retrospective study from Japan found that 18 out of 36 (50%) patients had involvement of non-cranial arteries ( 33 ), while another retrospective study from New Zealand found documented involvement of non-cranial arteries in only 10 out of 142 (7%) patients ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the lower incidence rate in our population is not entirely clear and cannot be attributed to geographical reasons alone. A recent study from New Zealand reported their incidence rate for biopsy-proven GCA at 10.5 per 100,000 people over the age of 50 ( 17 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies conducted in different regions in New Zealand reported similar incidence rates despite using different methodologies. In the first study from Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand, the mean annual incidence was 10.5 (95% CI 8.7–12.8) for biopsy-proven GCA and 15 (95% CI 12.6–17.6) per 100 000 for all cases including biopsy-negative cases and extracranial GCA [6]. In the second study from Counties Manukau District Health Board, New Zealand, it was 11.4 (95% CI 7.8–16.7) per 100 000 when all biopsy-proven and biopsy-negative cases were included.…”
Section: Large Vessel Vasculitismentioning
confidence: 99%