2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles of autosomal STRs (GHEP-MIX01, GHEP-MIX02 and GHEP-MIX03): Results and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both inter-and intra-laboratory studies involve the distribution of mixtures with known ground truth, usually as electronic files after analysis, among forensic scientists within a laboratory and/or to a number of different laboratories. The compiled results give a measure of the variability in performance within and between laboratories [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. At least two studies [38,39] (hereafter the GHEP-ISFG study and NIST studies) have appeared in courtroom discussion due to the wide range of results observed.…”
Section: Inter and Intra-laboratory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both inter-and intra-laboratory studies involve the distribution of mixtures with known ground truth, usually as electronic files after analysis, among forensic scientists within a laboratory and/or to a number of different laboratories. The compiled results give a measure of the variability in performance within and between laboratories [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. At least two studies [38,39] (hereafter the GHEP-ISFG study and NIST studies) have appeared in courtroom discussion due to the wide range of results observed.…”
Section: Inter and Intra-laboratory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crespillo et al [12] 32 (32) Prieto et al [13] 18 (20); 18 (22) 2 Data (csv format) provided for 16 STR loci with case scenarios; two exercises each involving a two-person mixture were supplied along with victim and suspect profiles, population allele frequencies, and LRmix software to explore impact of training and whether standardization of an approach could be demonstrated UK Forensic Science Regulator (2014) Unpublished report 8 (18) 5 DNA extracts provided with case scenarios for 2 two-person mixtures (4:1, 2:1) and 3 three-person mixtures (6:4:1, 6:3:1, 7:1.5:1) to explore variability across UK forensic science providers DFSC Mixture Study (2014-2015)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About a dozen interlaboratory studies exploring DNA mixture interpretation with short tandem repeat (STR) markers have been performed over the past two decades [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Duewer et al [9] 22 (37)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stated magnitude of errors or discordance in autosomal STR results rarely exceeded 1%, with a maximum of 4%, both in mock casework trials and kinship exercises, e.g., [ 33 , 46 , 54 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]. Higher error rates in mixture studies including low-template components [ 74 , 75 ] were not considered. Regardless of the method used in testing, human clerical errors in transcription of results were persistently reported, e.g., [ 21 , 33 , 46 , 48 , 54 , 64 , 66 , 69 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher error rates in mixture studies including low-template components [ 74 , 75 ] were not considered. Regardless of the method used in testing, human clerical errors in transcription of results were persistently reported, e.g., [ 21 , 33 , 46 , 48 , 54 , 64 , 66 , 69 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ]. While most authors did not detail the type of human error, a broad spectrum mirrored by the STRidER QC can be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%