2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ggsashimi: Sashimi plot revised for browser- and annotation-independent splicing visualization

Abstract: We present ggsashimi, a command-line tool for the visualization of splicing events across multiple samples. Given a specified genomic region, ggsashimi creates sashimi plots for individual RNA-seq experiments as well as aggregated plots for groups of experiments, a feature unique to this software. Compared to the existing versions of programs generating sashimi plots, it uses popular bioinformatics file formats, it is annotation-independent, and allows the visualization of splicing events even for large genomi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
149
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These counts were either combined with a count matrix of the human genes quantified by STAR and TMM/CPM normalized with edgeR ( Figure S1D) or normalized by the total number of viral junctionspanning reads per time point ( Figure S1E) [93]. Coverage plots were made from merged STAR-mapped BAM files, or from Bowtie-mapped small RNA-seq BAM files using ggsashimi [94]. This workflow was implemented with custom Python scripts in a Snakemake pipeline [95].…”
Section: Viral Rna-seq Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These counts were either combined with a count matrix of the human genes quantified by STAR and TMM/CPM normalized with edgeR ( Figure S1D) or normalized by the total number of viral junctionspanning reads per time point ( Figure S1E) [93]. Coverage plots were made from merged STAR-mapped BAM files, or from Bowtie-mapped small RNA-seq BAM files using ggsashimi [94]. This workflow was implemented with custom Python scripts in a Snakemake pipeline [95].…”
Section: Viral Rna-seq Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heatmaps and charts were visualized using Cummerbund (Trapnell et al, 2012), and Integrative Genomics Viewer (Thorvaldsdottir et al, 2013) was used for visualization of read depths and alignments. Sashimi plots were generated with ggsashimi using the alignment files generated with TopHat2 and hg19 annotation (Garrido-Martin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Rna-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) Exonic structure of the isoforms and location of exons 5, 6 and 7 (highlighted area). Compared to RBM23-001 (green), RBM23-002 (blue) lacks exon 6, and RBM23-003 (red), exons 4 and 6. c) Sashimi plot (corresponding to the highlighted area in b) displaying the mean exon inclusion of exon 6 of RBM23 across all brain cortex samples of each genotype group at rs2295682, obtained by ggsashimi 84 . The dashed line marks the location of the SNP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we employed REVIGO 75 79 (http://revigo.irb.hr/, with parameters: allowed similarity = 0.9, database = H. sapiens, semantic 80 metric = SimRel) to remove highly redundant terms and generate semantic similarity-based GO term 81 representations for sGenes and non-sGenes. 82 sQTL replication 83 To assess replication of GTEx sQTLs, we examined the p values for matched variant-gene pairs identified 84 as splicing QTLs by sQTLseekeR for three immune cell types (CD14 + monocytes, CD16 + neutrophils, and 85 naive CD4 + T cells) in the Blueprint Project (BP) 27 . Both studies have large differences in RNA sources 86 (tissues in GTEx vs cell types in Blueprint), library preparation (unstranded polyA + vs stranded Ribo-Zero), 87 sequencing strategy (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%