2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-018-0616-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GFAP canonical transcript may not be suitable for the diagnosis of adult-onset Alexander disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, some studies have found that the number of astrocytes in the brain and the expression of its specific cytoskeleton protein Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) are significantly decreased in some young patients with early-onset depression, and the expression level of GFAP can increase with age (10). GFAP is a biological marker protein of astrocytes (11). Numerous studies have shown that GFAP is involved in various physiological functions of astrocyte, such as maintaining the blood-brain barrier, synaptic plasticity, cell proliferation, and regulating the transport of vesicles and lysosomes in astrocyte (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, some studies have found that the number of astrocytes in the brain and the expression of its specific cytoskeleton protein Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) are significantly decreased in some young patients with early-onset depression, and the expression level of GFAP can increase with age (10). GFAP is a biological marker protein of astrocytes (11). Numerous studies have shown that GFAP is involved in various physiological functions of astrocyte, such as maintaining the blood-brain barrier, synaptic plasticity, cell proliferation, and regulating the transport of vesicles and lysosomes in astrocyte (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The c.1289G>A variant has been previously described in several cases; a sibling pair 81 with adult-onset AxD [11], and two descriptions of single, unrelated individuals in Karp 82 et al and Pinto e Vairo et al [9,13] (Table 1). It is possible that the patient reported by 83 Pinto e Vairo et al (2018) is related to the individuals we have studied in Family 1, and 84 hence not an independent occurrence of this variant [13]. In the study by Melchionda et 85 al., it was hypothesized that the pathogenic effect of the c.1289G>A variant resulted 86 from perturbation of the GFAP network by inefficiently incorporated GFAP-Arg430His 87 protein [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%