2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2004.21102.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting Your Feet Wet: Becoming a Public Health Nurse, Part 1

Abstract: While the competencies and theory relevant to public health nursing (PHN) practice continue to be described, much less attention has been given to the knowledge derived from practice (clinical know-how) and the development of PHN expertise. A study was designed to address this gap by recruiting nurses with varied levels of experience and from various practice sites. A convenience sample of 28 public health nurses and seven administrators/supervisors were interviewed. A subsample, comprised of less-experienced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above excerpt supports the argument developed in Part 1 (see SmithBattle, Diekemper, & Leander, 2004), namely, that the beginner's reliance on external guidelines and classroom principles and theories, while important, must yield to the ''real world'' of practice. In Part 2, additional exemplars highlight how the development of practical reasoning, perceptual skills, and responsiveness to clients supplants inexperienced public health nurses' theoretical understanding and promotes a situated understanding of practice (SmithBattle, Drake, & Diekemper, 1997).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The above excerpt supports the argument developed in Part 1 (see SmithBattle, Diekemper, & Leander, 2004), namely, that the beginner's reliance on external guidelines and classroom principles and theories, while important, must yield to the ''real world'' of practice. In Part 2, additional exemplars highlight how the development of practical reasoning, perceptual skills, and responsiveness to clients supplants inexperienced public health nurses' theoretical understanding and promotes a situated understanding of practice (SmithBattle, Drake, & Diekemper, 1997).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Doubt was expressed by all PHNs in the study, most commonly by questioning responses to a given situation, asking themselves ‘what did I do wrong’ and taking client decisions personally. SmithBattle, Diekemper and Leander [50] in their study of the development of PHN clinical expertise noted that the tendency to want to “fix” client problems was common, particularly among less-experienced practitioners. This desire to fix leads to the inevitable realization that they cannot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability to see the broader perspective was indicative of gains in the PHN’s relational and perceptual skills [16] allowing them to see achievement over time. Literature supports that discussion with experienced colleagues assist with the development of perspective and in identification of over-involvement [14,50]. As the impact of worry and doubt may stem from the gap between theory, or program guidelines, and the unpredictability of the practice environment, this is a significant area where supervisors need to focus their reflective supervision goals [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, SmithBattle et al. () found that struggling with the unfamiliar and learning relational skills were key aspects of PHN expertise development. Exploring characteristics of PHNs, Eckhart () found that the critical elements of caring, commitment, and empowerment contributed to PHN expertise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Studies related to expertise in public health nursing have examined the development of a population-focused practice (Diekemper, SmithBattle, & Drake, 1999a,b); nurse insight into expertise development (Langley, 1997;SmithBattle, Diekemper, & Leander, 2004); and characteristics of expertise (Eckhart, 1988;McMurray, 1992;Vellinga, 1979). Diekemper et al (1999a,b) used phenomenology to investigate expertise among PHNs in various practice settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%