2013
DOI: 10.4337/9781782547945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting Women on to Corporate Boards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals, organizations, governments, and societies have differing, often juxtaposed, rationales and logics which subsequently create ethical tensions for organizations and their leaders. Although some scholars implicitly address how quotas create tensions (e.g., Machold et al, 2013), there is no systematic attempt to describe and categorize these tensions. To review the literature on quotas, we follow Smith, Gonin, and Besharov (2013) in identifying three key tensions in how quotas are discussed and (re)presented: the motivations for quotas, including political ideologies; legitimacy in terms of meritocracy and ethics; and outcomes of implementing quotas for society, organizations, and individuals; and draw on four theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Individuals, organizations, governments, and societies have differing, often juxtaposed, rationales and logics which subsequently create ethical tensions for organizations and their leaders. Although some scholars implicitly address how quotas create tensions (e.g., Machold et al, 2013), there is no systematic attempt to describe and categorize these tensions. To review the literature on quotas, we follow Smith, Gonin, and Besharov (2013) in identifying three key tensions in how quotas are discussed and (re)presented: the motivations for quotas, including political ideologies; legitimacy in terms of meritocracy and ethics; and outcomes of implementing quotas for society, organizations, and individuals; and draw on four theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent institutional entrepreneurs leverage resources to “break with the rules and practices associated with the dominant institutional logics and practices” (Battilana, 2006: 657), and can manage conflicting institutional logics to change the status quo (Smith, Besharov, Wessels, & Chertok, 2012). There are many institutional entrepreneurs who championed the Norwegian quota including Trade Minister Gabrielsen and Gender Minister Valgerd Svarstad Haugland (Machold, 2013; Terjesen et al, 2015). In the UK, former minister Lord Davies personally cajoles individual CEOs and Chairs to balance their boards, and entrepreneurs such as Virgin founder Richard Branson now offer support for quotas (Branson, R., 2012; Velkova, 2015).…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The introduction in Norway of quotas for women on corporate boards has had great impact internationally, with advanced industrial countries either legislating quotas or opting for significant and strategic voluntary targets for women's participation on corporate boards (Machold et al 2013Teigen 2012a. A recurring question is whether this will fundamentally change the position of women in work, or simply enhance the career structure of a few fortunate women (Seierstad and Opsahl 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%