1999
DOI: 10.1126/science.283.5402.614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting to the Bottom of Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9,15]. In fact the nodes exhibited by the Wannier function profiles clearly reflect the presence of an antibonding repulsive interaction seen as an oscillation around the bonding region (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9,15]. In fact the nodes exhibited by the Wannier function profiles clearly reflect the presence of an antibonding repulsive interaction seen as an oscillation around the bonding region (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other relevant peak occurs at r 2:82 A, which is the oxygen±oxygen distance and has been interpreted in Refs. [9,15] as reflecting the partially covalent nature of the hydrogen bond. Note that this peak is absent in the gas phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one focuses on the nature of effects underlying hydrogen bonding, it should be reasonable to expect covalent features in strong H-bonds where intermolecular distances are usually short. 16,17 But it is more remarkable that even conventional Hbonds such as OÀ ÀHÁÁÁO in ice 19,20 or NÀ ÀHÁÁÁO in urea 21 have been the subject of recent controversy 20,22 because of the interpretation of Compton profile anisotropies observed in ordinary ice and crystalline urea as direct experimental evidence for partial covalency of H-bonds. 19,21 After an exhaustive study of geometry details of 89,537 AÀ ÀHÁÁÁB bonds (A,B ¼ N,O) in 698 high-resolution protein structures, Baker and coworkers 23 con-cluded not only that electrostatics ignores the essential physics of H-bonds 23a but also stated explicitly its partial covalent nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] On the other hand, TFTs have a major disadvantage, namely lower speeds caused by the reduced charge carrier mobility, which finds it's origin in the huge density of traps (localized electronic states) inherent to amorphous materials, which in turn is caused by the lattice mismatch between the materials used for the insulator and active layer. However, this disadvantage is rapidly disappearing as technology is improved; field-effect mobilities show a sharp upward trend over the last decades [7] and now reach the 1 cm 2 V À1 s À1 range, which is sufficient for low-frequency applications. These same traps also cause a large threshold (switch-on) voltage in TFTs that makes them incompatible with real applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%