2015
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1074659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting to know nature: evaluating the effects of the Get to Know Program on children’s connectedness with nature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
81
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ages of participants in the studies ranged from 6 years of age (Bruni et al, 2017) to 19 (Sellmann and Bogner, 2013). All of the studies included pre-and post-intervention measurements, while five also included a control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ages of participants in the studies ranged from 6 years of age (Bruni et al, 2017) to 19 (Sellmann and Bogner, 2013). All of the studies included pre-and post-intervention measurements, while five also included a control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kossack and Bogner (2012) report a negative effect of high information content, while Collado et al (2013) suggest that enjoyment and play may have a positive effect on nature connection in children. Bruni et al (2017) found that only the activity in which children engaged artistically with the natural world, such as narrative writing, art work, and photography, created a positive shift in nature connection. Immersive experiences and free outdoor play were seen as a positive feature by Mullenbach et al (2018) as well as Schneider and Schaal (2017).…”
Section: Length Type Of Intervention and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the investigation of the natural world does not explicitly advocate mastery over nature, the lack of evidence of sustained increases in connection with nature through environmental education programmes suggests activities purely focussing on knowledge and identification may not be pathways to nature connectedness. This was recently supported in a study where creative arts based activities, rather than educational nature trails, were associated with increases in implicit nature connectedness [52]. It should be noted that recent research claiming that species knowledge is important in connecting people to nature, did not use a validated measure of connection with nature [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Authors like Zylstra et al (2014) state that this disconnection from nature is mainly a consciousness problem, one that is fundamental among and for the convergent socio-ecological crises. This is of main importance for researchers and professionals concerned with environmental changes and degradation, since they see the solution to that problem as a way to develop environmental care and concern (Bruni et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%