SPSS Survival Manual 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003117445-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting to know IBM SPSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
345
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
345
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Descriptive data were summarised using frequencies, percentages, and, when possible, in terms of means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges. The statistics were calculated using the Chi-square test when comparing groups and Fisher’s exact test when the expected cell count was less than 5 [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descriptive data were summarised using frequencies, percentages, and, when possible, in terms of means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges. The statistics were calculated using the Chi-square test when comparing groups and Fisher’s exact test when the expected cell count was less than 5 [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the non-significant findings, participants with MDD did score worse than those without MDD. The effect size of the difference was 0.30, in which according to Cohen ( 61 ), although this is a small effect size, it displays a difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Due to the reasons like inability to meet inclusion criteria and data removed due to missing data, equal numbers of participants were not able to be obtained for each study group. Hence, for the multivariate analysis of variances (MANOVAs) the Pillai's trace was used instead of the Wilk's lambda, as it is more robust ( 46 , 47 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretesting was done by administering the scale to five adolescents and internal consistency was calculated statistically for each subscale after reversing the negatively phrased items. The average value obtained for Cronbach alpha coefficients was 0.79, which is > 0.7, indicating reliability of scale ( Pallant, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%