Getting the safe minimum standard to work in the real world: a case study in moral pragmatism

Farmer, Michael C.

doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00153-7

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The possibility of such a sustainability criterion factoring into a policy debate can be seen in a comparison of two early proposals for operation of Lake Lanier conducted by Farmer (2001) prior to the additional information from the NED report detailed above. In the conflict between Georgia and Florida, Florida suggested an environmental sustainability proposal premised on the best probability of exceeding a desired instream flow target lying above a required minimum flow critical to species survival.…”

Section: {W(ky+1) -W(ky)} > 0 For All Ymentioning

confidence: 99%

Reallocation of Federal Multipurpose Reservoirs: Principles, Policy, and Practice

McMahon

Farmer

2004

J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most federal reservoirs placed in operation throughout the United States over the past 50 or 60 years serve multiple objectives, typically flood control, hydropower, navigation, recreation, water quality protection, irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply. In the initial reservoir planning and design stage, federal agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) decide on the scale of the project to be built based on demands for water and storage that prevail at the time and are expected to prevail after construction. A critical step in the planning process is the development of operating rules designed to conjunctively meet these many demands given the scope and scale of the existing project. One of the criteria applied to formulate such operating rules is contribution to National Economic Development (NED). In the decades since their initial construction, relative demands for various services provided by federal reservoirs (expressed as society's willingness to pay for those services) have changed, in some cases substantially. These changes may prompt reallocation, or modifications to reservoir operating rules that better satisfy the more valuable emerging uses. Needed operational changes sometimes come at the expense of less valuable uses, even though these less valuable uses may constitute originally-authorized purposes of the project. Irrespective of any rights to water and/or to storage conveyed by federal law, significant questions of fairness (equity) and of economic efficiency arise with respect to the distribution of project benefits, costs and environmental impacts that occur if society chooses to reallocate or chooses not to reallocate. Fairness questions center on intergenerational equity and on sustainability while efficiency questions center on net economic surplus, or net benefits, aggregated across project uses. The authors examine as a case study the pronounced shift in public demand from hydropower to M&I water supply in the southeastern United States, to illustrate the potential disparities between the overarching principles that guide federal planning and the policies and procedures historically (and often successfully) used in practice to implement small, incremental reallocations. The normally small differences between objective principles and practical outcomes can accumulate over time to unacceptable proportions, foreclosing options for adaptive management of the nation's water resources infrastructure and threatening sustainability, equity and efficiency as a consequence.

show abstract

Section: {W(ky+1) -W(ky)} > 0 For All Ymentioning

confidence: 99%

Reallocation of Federal Multipurpose Reservoirs: Principles, Policy, and Practice

McMahon

Farmer

2004

J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Socioeconomic Value(s) of Restoring Environmental Flows: Systematic Review and Guidance for Assessment

Jordà-Capdevila

Rodríguez‐Labajos

2016

River Res. Applic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Safe Minimum Standards in Dynamic Resource Problems: Conditions for Living on the Edge of Risk

Margolis

Nævdal

2007

Environ Resource Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Safe Minimum Standards (SMSs) have been advocated as a policy rule for environmental problems where uncertainty about risks and consequences are thought to be profound. This paper explores the rationale for such a policy within a dynamic framework and derives conditions for when SMS can be summarily dismissed as a policy choice and for when SMS can be defended as an optimal policy based on standard economic criteria. We have determined that these conditions can be checked with quite limited information about damages and risks. In order to analyze the SMSs in a dynamic setting, we have developed a method for solving optimal control problems where the state space is divided into risky and non-risky subsets.

show abstract

Getting the safe minimum standard to work in the real world: a case study in moral pragmatism

Cited by 6 publications

References 31 publications

Reallocation of Federal Multipurpose Reservoirs: Principles, Policy, and Practice

Reallocation of Federal Multipurpose Reservoirs: Principles, Policy, and Practice

Socioeconomic Value(s) of Restoring Environmental Flows: Systematic Review and Guidance for Assessment

Safe Minimum Standards in Dynamic Resource Problems: Conditions for Living on the Edge of Risk

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About