2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting the Most Out of Wikidata: Semantic Technology Usage in Wikipedia’s Knowledge Graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wikidata: This collaboratively built knowledge base is mostly geared to organize encyclopedic facts about individual entities like people, places, organizations etc. [13,36]. It contains more than 400 million assertions for more than 50 million items.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wikidata: This collaboratively built knowledge base is mostly geared to organize encyclopedic facts about individual entities like people, places, organizations etc. [13,36]. It contains more than 400 million assertions for more than 50 million items.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model of statements aligns well with the RDF triple model of the semantic web and the content of Wikidata is also serialized as Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples (14,15) , acting as stepping stone for data resources to the semantic web. Through its SPARQL endpoint ( https://query.wikidata.org ), knowledge captured in Wikidata can be integrated with other nodes in the semantic web, using either mappings between these resources or through federated SPARQL queries (16) . Automated editing of Wikidata simplifies a lot of things, however, the quality control of that process must be monitored carefully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One prominent project is Wikidata, which has become one of the largest collections of open data on the web (16) . Wikidata follows the linked data principles offering both HTML and RDF views of every item with their corresponding links to related items, and a SPARQL endpoint called the Wikidata Query Service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, arbitrarily complex queries [2,3,7], entailing rather intricate, possibly recursive, graph patterns prove difficult to evaluate, even on small-sized graph datasets [4,5]. On the other hand, the usage of these queries has radically increased in real-world query logs, as shown by recent empirical studies on SPARQL queries from large-scale Wikidata and DBPedia corpuses [8,17]. As a tangible example of this growth, the percentage of SPARQL property paths has increased from 15% to 40%, from 2017 to beginning 2018 [17], for user-specified Wikidata queries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the usage of these queries has radically increased in real-world query logs, as shown by recent empirical studies on SPARQL queries from large-scale Wikidata and DBPedia corpuses [8,17]. As a tangible example of this growth, the percentage of SPARQL property paths has increased from 15% to 40%, from 2017 to beginning 2018 [17], for user-specified Wikidata queries. In this paper, we focus on regular path queries (RPQs) that identify paths labeled with regular expressions and aim to offer an approximate query evaluation solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%