2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting paid to be good: How and when employees respond to corporate social responsibility?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
121
3
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
16
121
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent studies on CSR shed light on the importance of middle managers for data collection in contrast to top managers [42], since middle managers act as a bridge between top managers and operational level employees while participating in the formulation and implementation of organizational strategies. This research employed multi-level and time-lagged data, which is a desirable research design in CSR research [5,7]. In survey research, one-time data collection for criterion and predictor variables may cause measurement context effect or method bias [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some recent studies on CSR shed light on the importance of middle managers for data collection in contrast to top managers [42], since middle managers act as a bridge between top managers and operational level employees while participating in the formulation and implementation of organizational strategies. This research employed multi-level and time-lagged data, which is a desirable research design in CSR research [5,7]. In survey research, one-time data collection for criterion and predictor variables may cause measurement context effect or method bias [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These positive impacts include employees' positive perceptions towards their companies' CSR and employees' organizational citizenship behavior [1], job satisfaction [2] and organizational identification [3]. In addition, there has been a recommendation to consider employees while developing social sustainability measures [4] and dedication of], as well as increased focus on special issues involving micro-CSR from organization behavior and human resource management journals [5]. However, this debate remains incomplete in various ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is intrinsic motivation: driven by moral responsibility and altruism, an enterprise is willing to selflessly serve the public and take on more CSR activities (Graafland and Mazereeuw-Van der Duijn Schouten, 2012). The second is extrinsic motivation: the enterprise is self-centered with regards to CSR activities such as a self-service or strategic action, and expects to obtain economic or other benefits (Arena et al, 2018;Castro-González et al, 2019;He, Z. et al, 2018;John et al, 2019;Lau et al, 2018;Siueia et al, 2019;Xie et al, 2017). The third motivation concerns with stakeholder and legitimacy:to meet the expectations of both stakeholders and public to gain legitimacy (Momin and Parker, 2013).…”
Section: Motives Consequences and Hypocrisy Of Csrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, intrinsic inspiration compelled by altruism and moral concern which is embedded in firm values to serve the public voluntarily (Graafland & Mazereeuw‐van der Duijn Schouten, 2012). Second inspiration arises out of extrinsic benefits that CSR strategies can lead to enhanced firm's competitiveness and legitimacy in the market which translates into economic gains (Arena, Azzone, & Mapelli, 2018; John, Qadeer, Shahzadi, & Jia, 2019; Xie, Jia, Meng, & Li, 2017). Third, CSR motivations are driven by demand from outside stakeholders such as the general public, NGOs, and government (Momin & Parker, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%