Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00108.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed‐Effects Variable Rule Analysis

Abstract: The variable rule program is one of the predominant data analysis tools used in sociolinguistics, employed successfully for over three decades to quantitatively assess the influence of multiple factors on linguistic variables. However, its most popular current version, GoldVarb, lacks flexibility and also isolates its users from the wider community of quantitative linguists. A new version of the variable rule program, Rbrul, attempts to resolve these concerns, and with mixed‐effects modelling also addresses a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
380
0
62

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 625 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
380
0
62
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision to enter the individual study participants into the model as a random term was motivated by our observation that certain individuals appear to us to produce more intrusives than do others. By fitting the data to a mixed effects rather than a fixed effects model, we are more confident that the significant trends that we observe are predictive and do not just reflect the behavior of one or two participants in our sample (Johnson, 2009;Drager and Hay, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The decision to enter the individual study participants into the model as a random term was motivated by our observation that certain individuals appear to us to produce more intrusives than do others. By fitting the data to a mixed effects rather than a fixed effects model, we are more confident that the significant trends that we observe are predictive and do not just reflect the behavior of one or two participants in our sample (Johnson, 2009;Drager and Hay, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below, we present the descriptive statistics on the overall rates of retention, intrusion, and deletion in the data set that includes all the observations (section 6). Next, we show the results of the mixed-effect logistic regression (Johnson, 2009), which analyzes the contribution of gender, literacy, speaker, and the linguistic internal factors to the probability that lexical-s will be retained rather than deleted. In a second analysis, in section 6.2, we describe the distribution of intrusive-s and discuss the correlation between an individual's use of lexical-s versus his or her use of intrusive-s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Para ello utilizamos el programa Rbrul (Johnson 2009), con el que obtenemos una relación de factores seleccionados como significativos, cuando todos se analizan al mismo tiempo, así como las potenciales interacciones entre sí. Además, Rbrul permite agrupar los casos según factores individuales aleatorios, como, en este caso, el escritor o los antecedentes con que se relacionan los relativos.…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified