Getting off the carousel: Exploring the wicked problem of curriculum reform

Abstract

IntroductionMaking substantial changes to the form and delivery of medical education is challenging. One reason for this may be misalignment between existing conceptualizations of curricula and curriculum reform in medical education, with the former perceived as ‘complex’ yet the latter as linear. Reframing curriculum reform as a process-driven, complex entity may enhance the possibility of change. To explore the utility of this approach, we carried out an exploratory case study of curriculum reform in a real-life context.MethodsWe used a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected from 17 interviews with senior faculty involved in curriculum reform in one medical school plus document analysis of approximately 50 documents and files, to provide background, context, and aid triangulation.ResultsData coding and analysis was initially inductive, using thematic analysis. After themes were identified, we applied the ‘wicked problem’ framework to highlight aspects of the data. This paper focuses on two main analytic themes. First, that multiple players hold different views and values in relation to curriculum reform, resulting in various influences on the process and outcomes of reform. Second, ‘solutions’ generate consequences which go beyond the anticipated advantages of curriculum reform.DiscussionThis is the first empirical study of curriculum reform in medical education which uses the wicked problem framework to conceptually illuminate the complex processes which occur in relation to reform. Those involved in reform must be reflective and attentive to the possibility that persistent and emerging challenges may be a result of wicked problems.

Thinking of selection and widening access as complex and wicked problems

“…Although developed over 40 years ago in the context of social planning, the ‘wicked problem’ framework is used extensively in management and organisational science and is being adopted increasingly to examine problems in the wider field of education, including medical education . The notion of using the frame of wicked problems with complexity theory has also been proposed previously, and this combination of complexity theory and the wicked problem framework has previously been applied in other fields (e.g.…”

The wicked problem of healthcare student attrition

“…For example, a course team may decide to provide early clinical placement experience to motivate students, but without considering the additional workload pressures for clinical staff in supervision of students without underpinning knowledge. This can lead to the somewhat fatalistic analyses described by Hawick et al (2017); there seems to be no way to 'get off the carousel', when repeated attempts at enhancement seem to reinforce a sociocultural situation that already existed.…”

Medical education research: aligning design and research goals

“…For example, you might want to examine whether early performance predicts later performance, 5 , 6 whether students spend more time preparing web‐based compared with paper‐based portfolios, 7 or how much variance in Mini‐Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini‐CEX) ratings is attributable to raters' social judgments 8 . On the other hand, social constructivist research questions tend to be about hypothesis generation — they are open and exploratory, seeking to understand phenomena such as student culture in a medical school, 9 the unintended consequences of a curriculum reform, 10 or how residents learn 11 . (Interestingly, the study by Gingerich and colleagues 8 is an example of a quantitative study which starts from a social constructivist perspective.…”