Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting

Abstract

BackgroundThe Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide was developed by an international team of experts to promote full and accurate description of trial interventions. It is now widely used in health research. The aim of this paper is to describe the experience of using TIDieR outside of trials, in a range of applied health research contexts, and make recommendations on its usefulness in such settings.Main bodyWe used the TIDieR template for intervention description in six applied health research projects. The six cases comprise a diverse sample in terms of clinical problems, population, settings, stage of intervention development and whether the intervention was led by researchers or the service deliverers. There was also variation in how the TIDieR description was produced in terms of contributors and time point in the project. Researchers involved in the six cases met in two workshops to identify issues and themes arising from their experience of using TIDieR.We identified four themes which capture the difficulties or complexities of using TIDieR in applied health research: (i) fidelity and adaptation: all aspects of an intervention can change over time; (ii) voice: the importance of clarity on whose voice the TIDieR description represents; (iii) communication beyond the immediate context: the usefulness of TIDieR for wider dissemination and sharing; (iv) the use of TIDieR as a research tool.ConclusionWe found TIDieR to be a useful tool for applied research outside the context of clinical trials and we suggest four revisions or additions to the original TIDieR which would enable it to better capture these complexities in applied health research:An additional item, ‘voice’ conveys who was involved in preparing the TIDieR template, such as researchers, service users or service deliverers.An additional item, ‘stage of implementation’ conveys what stage the intervention has reached, using a continuum of implementation research suggested by the World Health Organisation.A new column, ‘modification’ reminds authors to describe modifications to any item in the checklist.An extension of the ‘how well’ item encourages researchers to describe how contextual factors affected intervention delivery.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-017-0461-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hospital falls prevention with patient education: a scoping review

“…face to face discussions, handouts, videotapes) can sometimes be more effective than using a single modality, although this varies according to hospital settings and patient characteristics; (iii) falls education interventions are most helpful when their design incorporates theories of health behaviour change and educational principles; (iv) incorporation of an active learning design can better engage some patients. In addition, reporting of interventions should follow established guidelines to ensure transparency and improve the quality of hospital falls research [8,97].…”

Using the TIDieR checklist to describe health visitor support for mothers with mental health problems: Analysis of a cross‐sectional survey

“…The TIDieR checklist item was developed to provide a standardised framework for describing interventions to ensure a consistent approach to intervention delivery (Hoffman et al, ). Although the checklist has predominantly been used in RCTs to ensure agreement and conformity to an intervention protocol, it has also been used to highlight where modifications to interventions have occurred (Cotterill et al, ). The checklist was used in this study as a way of systematically categorising commonalities and variations in the delivery of LVs according to an internationally agreed consensus regarding the essential elements that should be included in descriptions of interventions.…”

Context-Aware Systems for Chronic Disease Patients: Scoping Review (Preprint)

“…It is known that implementation settings play a crucial role in the effectiveness of interventions, an issue that is at the core of implementation science's efforts to model the impact of context on outcomes [25]. In order to allow for implementation fidelity and replicability, studies of context-aware systems should describe the setting explicitly, as well as provide sufficient details about the intervention and any potential adaptations for it to fit a different setting [26,27].…”