Getting Inside the Black Box: A Field Study of Practices in “Effective” Audit Committees

Abstract

Although audit committees typically are considered a crucial corporate governance mechanism, knowledge is scant about the practices carried out in audit committee meetings. This paper provides insights into practices that audit committee members carry out in meetings, including the part of the meetings where members meet privately with auditors. The investigation was conducted via a field study in three Canadian public corporations—whose respective audit committees complied to a large extent with regulatory guidelines of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the voluntary recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on audit committee effectiveness. Further, the three audit committees that we investigated are generally perceived as effective by the individuals who attend meetings. Our results highlight key matters that audit committee members emphasize during meetings, such as: accuracy of financial statements; appropriateness of the wording used in financial reports; effectiveness of internal controls; and the quality of the work performed by auditors. We also elicit the evaluation criteria that members use to assess written and verbal information submitted by managers and auditors. In addition, we found that a key aspect of the work carried out by audit committee members consists of asking challenging questions and assessing responses provided by managers and auditors.

Audit committees: practices, practitioners and praxis of governance

“…To some extent, she contradicts herself (p. 251) when she observes that the symbolic nature of audit committees, even passive ones, strengthens the praxis of governance. While Gendron et al (2004) empathise with Spira's perspective, they ultimately conclude that audit committee meetings are "not mere rituals" (p. 168). Similarly, Beasley et al (2009) find evidence of both substantive oversight activities by audit committees, together with symbolic rituals.…”

Can Auditors be Independent? Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Client Type

“…Although the archival literature identifies important determinants for audit committee effectiveness, it provides limited insights into the process how audit committee members influence auditor behaviour (Gendron et al, 2004). We investigate how oversight boards affect auditor behaviour via its impact on the effects of auditors' accountability pressure and client retention incentives.…”

The Relationship Between Segment-Level Manipulations And Audit Fees

“…In the Sarbanes-Oxley era, the audit committee plays a critical role in authorizing additional audit testing and settling auditor-management disputes. When dealing with auditor-management disputes, the audit committee's decisions are highly dependent upon the clarity of the underlying standard (Klein 2002;Gendron et al 2004). Agoglia et al (2011) finds that auditors have little support from the audit committee when dealing with imprecise standards.…”