2022
DOI: 10.1111/dar.13433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting high for likes: Exploring cannabis‐related content on TikTok

Abstract: Introduction With over 1 billion monthly users globally, a third of whom are under 14 years, TikTok's popularity is indisputable. Publicly available cannabis‐related content on this platform may influence perceptions of cannabis use. We aimed to examine how cannabis‐related videos are portrayed on TikTok. Methods Data were collected from TikTok using hashtag‐based keywords on cannabis‐related videos (n = 1377). Seven researchers documented video metrics (i.e. views, likes, comments) and independently coded vid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 15 905 182 substance‐related social media posts (15 804 353 text posts, 68 023 image posts, and 32 470 video posts) were assessed across all 73 studies. Twitter data was analysed in 34 studies [20–53]; 23 studies examined YouTube [54–76]; 10 assessed Instagram content [77–85]; 4 studies used Pinterest images [85–88]; TikTok videos were analysed in 2 studies [89, 90]; and Weibo content was assessed in a single study [91]. E‐cigarettes were the most common category analysed ( n = 24 studies), followed by tobacco ( n = 20 studies), cannabis ( n = 18 studies), opiates ( n = 6 studies), alcohol ( n = 4 studies), psychostimulants ( n = 1 study), stimulants/amphetamines ( n = 1 study), inhalants ( n = 1 study), novel psychoactive substances (NPS) ( n = 1 study) and polysubstance use ( n = 1 study).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 15 905 182 substance‐related social media posts (15 804 353 text posts, 68 023 image posts, and 32 470 video posts) were assessed across all 73 studies. Twitter data was analysed in 34 studies [20–53]; 23 studies examined YouTube [54–76]; 10 assessed Instagram content [77–85]; 4 studies used Pinterest images [85–88]; TikTok videos were analysed in 2 studies [89, 90]; and Weibo content was assessed in a single study [91]. E‐cigarettes were the most common category analysed ( n = 24 studies), followed by tobacco ( n = 20 studies), cannabis ( n = 18 studies), opiates ( n = 6 studies), alcohol ( n = 4 studies), psychostimulants ( n = 1 study), stimulants/amphetamines ( n = 1 study), inhalants ( n = 1 study), novel psychoactive substances (NPS) ( n = 1 study) and polysubstance use ( n = 1 study).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to text content, visual content may be more engaging (Strowger & Braitman, 2022) and provide more key contextual information. Most substance use posts are in a positive context (Beullens & Schepers, 2013; Erevik et al, 2018; Rutherford et al, 2022), and users may see a social event in which others are enjoying themselves and each other as they consume alcohol, which in turn may increase perceived approval of and subsequent use (Nesi et al, 2017). These visual portrayals may be especially important for emerging adults as they navigate new social contexts and determine how certain behaviors are perceived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging adults can utilize social media to gain an understanding of how substances are valued, viewed, and used among new peers. Substances are often portrayed favorably on social media (Beullens & Schepers, 2013; Erevik et al, 2018; Rutherford et al, 2022) and receive more likes compared to non-substance use posts, signaling social approval (Kurten et al, 2022). It is therefore critical to understand how emerging adults are exposed to others’ social media substance postings, as this exposure may play a key role in emerging adults’ own substance use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The videos were manually annotated (using binary classification—whether the video depicted nicotine poisoning or nicotine sickness or not) and then inductively coded for specific themes that emerged, such as showing active vaping, specific adverse events, or nicotine sickness experiences ( Table 1 ). Furthermore, based on prior research studies [ 7 , 32 , 33 ] that have conducted content analysis on TikTok videos, we also coded the following metrics and associated metadata: (1) user engagement (views, likes, comments, shares, followers, verification); (2) video characteristics (duration, caption, text on screen, subtitles, music); and (3) video type (original, duet, stitch). An original video is a microvideo uploaded by a TikTok user and is the primary source of user-generated posts on the platform.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%