2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting educated on care for the LGBTQ community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus highlighting that care should be taken when choosing the combination of the lubricant and the disintegrant for a given formulation. Magnesium stearate increased the swelling intensity score compared to sodium stearyl fumarate partially due to their different size differences but more likely owing to their different aqueous solubility [ 101 ]. As the swelling is promoted by the liquid imbibition, it is sensitive to the surface-liquid contact interface properties, i.e., how hydrophobic the surface is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus highlighting that care should be taken when choosing the combination of the lubricant and the disintegrant for a given formulation. Magnesium stearate increased the swelling intensity score compared to sodium stearyl fumarate partially due to their different size differences but more likely owing to their different aqueous solubility [ 101 ]. As the swelling is promoted by the liquid imbibition, it is sensitive to the surface-liquid contact interface properties, i.e., how hydrophobic the surface is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in a formulation increased this score, while polyethylene oxide lowered it. The linear polymer structure of PEO suggests fast water binding ability but also the formation of weaker, erodible gels [ 101 , 103 ]. Therefore, in the presence of factors facilitating erosion of the polyethylene oxide gel, the swelling intensity is not as prominent, as seen from this study's experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation