2021
DOI: 10.1515/pjbr-2021-0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting collaborative robots to work: A study of ethics emerging during the implementation of cobots

Abstract: Following ethnographic studies of Danish companies, this article examines how small- and medium-sized companies are implementing cobots into their manufacturing systems and considers how this is changing the practices of technicians and operators alike. It considers how this changes human values and has ethical consequences for the companies involved. By presenting a range of dilemmas arising during emergent processes, it raises questions about the extent to which ethics can be regulated and predetermined in p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They might on the one hand appreciate a reduction of the mental and physical workload, for example if the cobot takes over repetitive and monotonous tasks [57]. On the other hand, decreased complexity can be perceived negatively if employees fear mental underload due to lower speed and longer waiting times [53] or if the lower complexity puts the social position of the employee at risk [58]. It is therefore essential in terms of satisfactory working conditions to take cognitive load and mental workload into account when assigning tasks to humans and cobots [59].…”
Section: Changes In the Daily Work Routinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They might on the one hand appreciate a reduction of the mental and physical workload, for example if the cobot takes over repetitive and monotonous tasks [57]. On the other hand, decreased complexity can be perceived negatively if employees fear mental underload due to lower speed and longer waiting times [53] or if the lower complexity puts the social position of the employee at risk [58]. It is therefore essential in terms of satisfactory working conditions to take cognitive load and mental workload into account when assigning tasks to humans and cobots [59].…”
Section: Changes In the Daily Work Routinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case study revealed a difference between technicians and operators. Technicians might have better career prospects than mere operators, but they could also be called upon to do the work of operators as necessary (Wallace, 2021). Operators, for their part, might lose some of the well-being and status of their pre-cobot working: they would be turned instead into servicers of a robot-fillersup of its fluids and feeder trays, monitors of its normal operations, and so on (Wallace, 2021, p. 306).…”
Section: Does Participatory Design and Integration Preclude Human Rep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the adoption of robots by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) introduces specific challenges, particularly related to achieving new skills and developing new work expertise [3]. Introducing robots into the workplace is a technical practice that significantly impacts the daily procedure of shopfloor workers [4]. Robotics integration is a complex and multidimensional learning process that involves the company's human capital ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%