2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0002020600005655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting Close to Rwandans since the Genocide: Studying Everyday Life in Highly Politicized Research Settings

Abstract: Abstract:Research with people in highly politicized research settings illuminates the gap between the images that most African governments strive to represent and the sociopolitical realities of everyday life. This article discusses the opportunities and challenges of doing research in postgenocide Rwanda and is a useful resource for researchers contemplating their own projects under such conditions, whether in Rwanda or elsewhere. It discusses the importance of creating personal relationships and meeting peop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the urban community, however, most of those interviewed are among the poorer. Rwanda has been described as a difficult place to conduct ethnographic research, due to government control and reluctance among residents to openly share their views, making it difficult to reach beyond the “public transcript” (Thomson, ; Begley, ). In these interviews, however, people appeared to talk openly and with ease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the urban community, however, most of those interviewed are among the poorer. Rwanda has been described as a difficult place to conduct ethnographic research, due to government control and reluctance among residents to openly share their views, making it difficult to reach beyond the “public transcript” (Thomson, ; Begley, ). In these interviews, however, people appeared to talk openly and with ease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have noted particular challenges of conducting research in Rwanda, including government interference in research (Burnet : 25; Ingelaere 2010 a : 42, 50; Pottier ; Thomson 2010 b : 22) and people's subsequent ‘selective telling’ (King : 128). They note that researchers must find ways to avoid taking the government's ‘stage‐setting for granted’ (Ingelaere 2010 a : 42; see also Thomson 2011 a : 375‐6).…”
Section: A Note On Fieldwork Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to work with the intended target of gacaca – most specifically the rural population, abaturage – and recognizing the importance of interacting with rural Rwandans rather than political and economic elites in the capital (De Lame ; Ingelaere 2010 a : 54; b ; D. Newbury & Newbury ; Thomson 2010 b ), I focused my research in two field sites in southern Rwanda, one rural and one a mid‐size town. I supplemented attendance at gacaca sessions with countless informal conversations with local residents, and with repeated semi‐structured interviews with a cross‐section of people in each area, including gacaca judges, mediators, local authorities, and religious leaders.…”
Section: A Note On Fieldwork Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, later on, the individual would report that in fact she was the person'. 52 Clearly fear of rape was pervasive. Several women described how, as young girls, they were disguised as older women or given babies to carry, in an attempt to ward off would-be rapists.…”
Section: The Asaba Massacre and The Nigerian Civil Warmentioning
confidence: 99%