2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

20
373
2
17

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
20
373
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with a recent systematic review that highlighted the importance of increased exposure to fruit and vegetables (37) . It is possible that the treatment effect for both willingness to taste and preferences may have been greater if the same vegetables used in the testing were also grown in the school garden.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with a recent systematic review that highlighted the importance of increased exposure to fruit and vegetables (37) . It is possible that the treatment effect for both willingness to taste and preferences may have been greater if the same vegetables used in the testing were also grown in the school garden.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, it is interesting to note that several interventions used to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among healthy individuals have been able to maintain intervention effects over the medium to long term (Ammerman, Lindquist, Lohr, & Hersey, 2002;Knai, Pomerleau, Lock, & McKee, 2006;Pomerleau, Lock, Knai, & McKee, 2005). Further research is needed to determine whether the increases in fruit and vegetable consumption observed in the current study could also be maintained over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The column 'number of samples' displays the number of samples that have been studied for each identified correlate. The 'summary' column contains the number of samples finding positive (1), inverse (2) and no (0) associations for each family correlate. Based on the per cent of findings supporting the association (number of associations supporting the expected association divided by the total number of associations for that variable), the variable was classified as no association (0-33 %), indeterminate/inconsistent (34-59 %) and positive or negative association (60-100 %).…”
Section: Summary Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%