2022
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting by With Less: How to do More With Less Staff After COVID-19?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, individuals of lower SES were more likely to be frontline workers with higher potential exposure to the virus (Afridi & Block, 2020). In contrast, individuals of higher SES were more likely to be working or furloughed at home with comforts such as a well-stocked pantry, stable Internet, and spacious living arrangements (Reeves & Rothwell, 2020). Despite these differences, a national poll by Axios-Ipsos reported that 47% of Americans of higher SES indicated their emotional well-being had gotten worse because of the pandemic, compared to only 34% of lower SES individuals (Talev, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, individuals of lower SES were more likely to be frontline workers with higher potential exposure to the virus (Afridi & Block, 2020). In contrast, individuals of higher SES were more likely to be working or furloughed at home with comforts such as a well-stocked pantry, stable Internet, and spacious living arrangements (Reeves & Rothwell, 2020). Despite these differences, a national poll by Axios-Ipsos reported that 47% of Americans of higher SES indicated their emotional well-being had gotten worse because of the pandemic, compared to only 34% of lower SES individuals (Talev, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first has to do with the health conditions and access to healthcare. It is clear that the health and access to healthcare resources of individuals with fewer resources is worse than they are for those who are economically privileged (e.g., Reeves & Rothwell, 2020). Secondly, people with lower incomes have fewer possibilities of working at home for a number of reasons, such as because their jobs require their presence or they cannot afford to quit because they depend totally on their monthly salaries and they have meagre savings (Belser, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post hoc analysis supports these conclusions: we found significant positive relations between prejudice and action for participants high in just world beliefs but significant negative relations between these same variables for participants low in just world beliefs. Social class inequities and classism are deeply engrained in the United States, and have grown and become more explicit since the 2008 recession and the COVID-19 pandemic (Adams et al, 2016; Horowitz et al, 2020; Reeves & Rothwell, 2020). In this context, people may be particularly motivated to maintain their social class status and worldview (Liu, 2012b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%