1980
DOI: 10.1177/089124168000900102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting Better Quality Stuff

Abstract: EDITOR'S NOTE: As the previous article suggested, critics as well as practitioners of ethnographic research have observed that researchers tend to overrely on informants, and as a comsequence they may overemphasize those data which support a favored imagery rather than reporting counterinstances which challenge that imagery or indicate possible variations. Michael Agar suggests that one remedy to this problem is a mix of quantitative and qualitative procedures. Drawing from cognitive anthropology, he suggests … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that our presence affected the actions of the parlor employees and how thoroughly they performed teat-end cleaning during udder preparation. Observer effects have been described numerous times and are thought to affect people's behaviors, especially in research settings (Agar, 1980;Monahan and Fisher, 2010). We further hypothesize that teat-end cleaning, which can be influenced by workers' behavior, is driving the decrease in spore levels in bulk tank raw milk, not washing towels with chlorine bleach, because workers' habits can be influenced by research staff observing milking shifts.…”
Section: Worker Training and Spore Reductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We hypothesize that our presence affected the actions of the parlor employees and how thoroughly they performed teat-end cleaning during udder preparation. Observer effects have been described numerous times and are thought to affect people's behaviors, especially in research settings (Agar, 1980;Monahan and Fisher, 2010). We further hypothesize that teat-end cleaning, which can be influenced by workers' behavior, is driving the decrease in spore levels in bulk tank raw milk, not washing towels with chlorine bleach, because workers' habits can be influenced by research staff observing milking shifts.…”
Section: Worker Training and Spore Reductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to the study [27] there are not any fixed and single-out guidelines to analyze the data in the quantitative study, but several different guidelines have been suggested by [29]- [30]- [27]. After the transcriptions of the interviews, the next phase was to generate the codes as [31] suggested: "……..read the transcripts in their entirety several times, immerse yourself in the details, trying to get a sense of the interview as a whole before breaking it into parts [31]." The author, after a thorough reading of the interviews, started to break down the data into parts and started labeling them to take out the most important points from the interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%