2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062474
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting a Grip on Memory: Unilateral Hand Clenching Alters Episodic Recall

Abstract: Unilateral hand clenching increases neuronal activity in the frontal lobe of the contralateral hemisphere. Such hand clenching is also associated with increased experiencing of a given hemisphere’s “mode of processing.” Together, these findings suggest that unilateral hand clenching can be used to test hypotheses concerning the specializations of the cerebral hemispheres during memory encoding and retrieval. We investigated this possibility by testing effects of unilateral hand clenching on episodic memory. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects have been attributed to an induced shift in activation asymmetry to the contralateral hemisphere induced through the contractions, hence enhancing the functions in which that hemisphere specializes and affecting performance in a subsequent task. Among the reported effects are heightened approach motivation after right contractions [ 1 , 2 , 4 ]; increased processing to global visual stimuli after left, and local stimuli after right contractions [ 5 ]; enhanced memory encoding after right, and retrieval after left contractions [ 3 ]; and prevention of motor skill failure under pressure after left hand contractions [ 6 ]. In the above studies, it is assumed that the activation asymmetry towards the contralateral hemisphere induced through unilateral hand contractions persists even after their termination (referred to hereafter as a persistent activity model ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects have been attributed to an induced shift in activation asymmetry to the contralateral hemisphere induced through the contractions, hence enhancing the functions in which that hemisphere specializes and affecting performance in a subsequent task. Among the reported effects are heightened approach motivation after right contractions [ 1 , 2 , 4 ]; increased processing to global visual stimuli after left, and local stimuli after right contractions [ 5 ]; enhanced memory encoding after right, and retrieval after left contractions [ 3 ]; and prevention of motor skill failure under pressure after left hand contractions [ 6 ]. In the above studies, it is assumed that the activation asymmetry towards the contralateral hemisphere induced through unilateral hand contractions persists even after their termination (referred to hereafter as a persistent activity model ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the order of hands used for unilateral handgrip exercise may influence the episodic memory recall performance. The hypothesis was made on the basis of the hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry model (Propper et al, 2013). This model proposes that the left prefrontal cortex plays an important role in memory encoding, whereas the right prefrontal cortex plays an important role in memory retrieval.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies reported on the acute effect of isometric handgrip exercise on interference control (Stroop task and Flanker task) (Brown & Bray, 2015; Thibault et al, 2019) and episodic memory (word list free recall, and logical memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale III, and Benton visual retention test) (Loprinzi et al, 2020; Nielson et al, 2014; Propper et al, 2013; Tomporowski et al, 2017) (Table 4). One study reported chronic changes in the performance of cognitive tasks associated with perception and motor speed (Trail making Test A) and overall executive functioning (Trail making Test B and controlled oral word association task) following isometric handgrip training (Dempster et al, 2018) (Table 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third source is current neurophysiological research on the role of movement and touch in learning (Minogue & Jones, 2006). That is, touch serves to bond a speaker's senses together (Fredembach, de Boisferon, & Gentaz, 2009) and enhances memory of events and language (Propper, McGraw, Brunyé, & Weiss, 2013). The fourth source is the proposition that kinaesthetic approaches to L2 pronunciation instruction facilitate learning (Acton, 1984).…”
Section: Haptic Pronunciation Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%