Gesund digital arbeiten?!

Gimpel, Henner; Lanzl, Julia; Regal, Christian; Urbach, Nils; Wischniewski, Sascha; Tegtmeier, Patricia; Kreilos, Mathias; Kühlmann, Torsten M.; Becker, J.; Eimecke, Jörgen; Derra, Nicholas Daniel

doi:10.24406/fit-n-562039

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, digital systems and networked systems can capture and manage more business and process data. In the interaction between people, digital work processes and work tools, the risk of human information overload arises due to the quantity and complexity of the data involved [ 50 , 55 ]. Among other things, these demands are associated with impairments in mental health [ 56 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The use of digital technologies, including the learning and assistance systems mentioned above, can also lead to an increased sense of performance monitoring, as well as increased information overload and complexity [ 55 ]. The challenge lies in a balanced design of support solutions that challenge employees without overtaxing them, while not counteracting the actual learning process through too much support [ 74 , 75 , 76 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is likely that digital technologies will increasingly support employees in their work processes, or partially or completely replace them. The freedom from interference and errors of systems such as video systems, VPN tunnels, or network coverage will become a condition for avoiding misuse and/or endangerment of employees interacting with the technologies [ 55 , 98 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Tegtmeier

Weber²,

Sommer

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the increasing digital transformation, work tasks are changing—in some cases, significantly. Our study addresses the question of whether the established criteria for work design are still sufficient or if they should get updated and additional criteria become necessary in the context of digitalization. In a multistage consensus process involving interdisciplinary groups of experts, we have identified specific criteria for the humane design of work in a world increasingly permeated by digitalized work tools. Starting with an expert workshop using a combined nominal group/focus group technique, followed by a real-time Delphi study, a content analysis and a five-stage peer comment process, we detected 13 criteria and 38 design guidelines for human-centered work in digital transformation. Mapping these with established criteria, it became apparent that some established criteria have experienced a new dynamic because of the digital transformation. For other criteria, a need for digitization-sensitive design is discernible. In addition, criteria have emerged whose necessity is rooted in the digital transformation. A diffusion and stronger interconnection of the various levels of the work system in connection with the digital transformation of work is apparent.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Tegtmeier

Weber²,

Sommer

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Those affected are more likely to suffer from accompanying symptoms such as headaches, fatigue and exhaustion, and sleep disturbances (Gimpel et al, 2018 ). Digital stress is negatively related to well-being, health, and work ability (Gimpel et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of digital stress on negative emotions and physical complaints in the home office: a follow up study

Wrede,

Claassen,

Rodil dos Anjos

et al. 2023

Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Due to the COVID-19 pandemic many employees perform under increasingly digital conditions. Enabling home office environments became mandatory for companies wherever possible in consideration of the ongoing pandemic. Simultaneously, studies reported on digital stress. The current literature lacks rigorous research into digital stress on psychosomatic outcomes, emotions, and disease. Therefore, we endeavor to understand how digital stress developed over the course of the pandemic and if it predicts differences in negative emotions and physical complaints in the home office setting. Methods To answer the research question, we conducted an online survey among 441 employees in 2020 and 398 employees in 2022 from three municipal administrations in Germany, who were working from home at least occasionally. We used a cluster analysis to detect digitally stressed employees. Regression analyses were performed on digital stress, negative emotions, and physical complaints. Results The analysis revealed an increase from 9 to 20% in digital stress, while negative emotions and physical complaints did not show evident differences. In the multivariate model, we observe a change in the proportion of digitally stressed employees between 4 and 17%, while the control variables explain around 9%. Conclusions Digital stress did not significantly affect either negative emotions or physical complaints. However, digital stress appeared to exert a more substantial predictive influence on negative emotions. The study emphasizes rising digital stress, which contradicts a positive adaption to the digital working conditions within the observed period. The psychosomatic relations are low or lagged. Further research investigating digital stress and countermeasures, especially to understand how to prevent harmful long-term effects such as distress resulting from working from home conditions, is needed.

show abstract

Digitaler Stress im Versicherungsvertrieb – eine empirische Studie bei selbständigen Ausschließlichkeitsvermittler*innen in Deutschland

Wendland,

Lentföhr

2023

Weiterbildung Und Forschung Der SRH Fernhochschule – The Mobile University

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gesund digital arbeiten?!

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Impact of digital stress on negative emotions and physical complaints in the home office: a follow up study

Digitaler Stress im Versicherungsvertrieb – eine empirische Studie bei selbständigen Ausschließlichkeitsvermittler*innen in Deutschland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About