Gesturing with shared drawing tools

Wolf, Catherine G.; Rhyne, James R.

doi:10.1145/259964.260150

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As Wolf and Rhyne (1993) observed, drawing persistence has both pros and cons. When the partner is not directing his or her attention to the spot where the drawing is being made, persistence allows them to view the drawing at a delay.…”

Section: Study 2: Drawing Gesturesmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…Although many drawing tools were designed primarily to support the creation of shared images (e.g., architectural diagrams or design sketches), studies of their use have observed the importance of the tools for gestural communication. In We-Met (Wolf, Rhyne, & Briggs, 1992;Wolf & Rhyne, 1993), a pen-based shared drawing tool, 15% of people's speaking turns included gestures. Circles, arrows, and similar marks were used for indicating parts of the shared drawing, and two-way arrows were used to express more complex relationships.…”

Section: Implementing Gesture In Video Systems For Remote Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gestures Over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks

Fussell¹,

Setlock²,

Yang³

et al. 2004

Human–Computer Interaction

267

205

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article considers tools to support remote gesture in video systems being used to complete collaborative physical tasks-tasks in which two or more individuals work together manipulating three-dimensional objects in the real world. We first discuss the process of conversational grounding during collaborative physical tasks, particularly the role of two types of gestures in the grounding process: pointing gestures, which are used to refer to task objects and locations, and rep- HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2004, Volume 19, pp. 273-309 Copyright © 2004 resentational gestures, which are used to represent the form of task objects and the nature of actions to be used with those objects. We then consider ways in which both pointing and representational gestures can be instantiated in systems for remote collaboration on physical tasks. We present the results of two studies that use a "surrogate" approach to remote gesture, in which images are intended to express the meaning of gestures through visible embodiments, rather than direct views of the hands. In Study 1, we compare performance with a cursor-based 274 FUSSELL ET AL.

show abstract

Section: Study 2: Drawing Gesturesmentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Implementing Gesture In Video Systems For Remote Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gestures Over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks

Fussell¹,

Setlock²,

Yang³

et al. 2004

Human–Computer Interaction

267

205

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hayne et al [6] report that the use of visual feedback has potential drawbacks in shared display systems, where visual feedback may take the form of multiple cursors that compete for valuable display space and obscure informative parts of the display. Wolf and Rhyne [22] further observe that maintaining real-time visual feedback significantly increases the workload of network and processor resources.…”

Section: Feedback In Spatial Interactionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Pointing and Visual Feedback for Spatial Interaction in Large-Screen Display Environments

Fisher

Booth

2003

Smart Graphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The two visual systems hypothesis in neuroscience suggests that pointing without visual feedback may be less affected by spatial visual illusions than cognitive interactions such as judged target location. Our study examined predictions of this theory for target localization on a large-screen display. We contrasted pointing interactions under varying levels of visual feedback with location judgments of targets that were surrounded by an offset frame. As predicted by the theory, the frame led to systematic errors in verbal report of target location but not in pointing without visual feedback for some participants. We also found that pointing with visual feedback produced a similar level of error as location judgments, while temporally lagged visual feedback appeared to reduce these errors somewhat. This suggests that pointing without visual feedback may be a useful interaction technique in situations described by the two visual systems literature, especially with large-screen displays and immersive environments.

show abstract

“…Buxton offered early insights into the cognitive functions, such as "chunking," that gestures may play in interaction [17]. Since the 1990s, stroke gestures as an interaction modality have been explored in a wide range of research prototypes for different application domains in the HCI research literature [25,95,128].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%