2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0047404512000292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gesture's community: Social organization in multimodal conduct

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThis article analyzes the multimodal integration of gesture, talk, and sociocultural context. More specifically, I investigate how forms of Gemeinschaft/ Gesellshaft community are embodied in the concrete details of multimodal form-in the iconic interplay of multimodal practice and symbolic forms of social organization. Using a focus group interview of community policing training, I show how criss-crossing laminations of participation emerge through novel gestural configurations like multimodal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Briggs (1986: 3) recognizes, researchers often take what is said as a reflection of what is ‘out there’, information to be harvested and domesticated into the aims of the researcher rather than a joint interaction between the interviewer and respondent(s). 5 In the orthodox interview, the interviewer’s contributions are ‘bleached’ from the final interview product along with any traces of bodily conduct, an erasure with immense consequences for understanding focus group evaluation (see Matoesian, 2005, 2012; Matoesian and Coldren, 2002). 6…”
Section: Focus Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Briggs (1986: 3) recognizes, researchers often take what is said as a reflection of what is ‘out there’, information to be harvested and domesticated into the aims of the researcher rather than a joint interaction between the interviewer and respondent(s). 5 In the orthodox interview, the interviewer’s contributions are ‘bleached’ from the final interview product along with any traces of bodily conduct, an erasure with immense consequences for understanding focus group evaluation (see Matoesian, 2005, 2012; Matoesian and Coldren, 2002). 6…”
Section: Focus Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%