GestOnHMD: Enabling Gesture-based Interaction on Low-cost VR Head-Mounted Display

Chen, Taizhou; Xu, Lantian; Xu, Xianshan; Zhu, Kening

doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3067689

Cited by 22 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, the use of VR in commercial multimedia applications is mostly limited to using a wide/ultra display or a smartphone. In the last decade, many high-quality HMDs [5] have been developed which range from simple Google Cardboard based headsets [6] to more advanced devices such as Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, and Sony PlayStation VR.…”

Section: Virtual Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second display device is a VR Box headset. The VR Box headset is a low cost VR head mounted display that is designed on the principles of Google Cardboard VR headset [6]. The VR Box headset uses smartphone for displaying VR contents.…”

Section: Vr Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The post hoc test reveal that except for VR contents created without straightening (viewed on 2D-vs-Smartphone) and contents created using Hugin (view on all three displays), all other results showed significant difference in VR experience. 6 The chi-square values have degrees of freedom equal to 2.…”

Section: Impact Of Vr Content Quality and Display Devices On Presencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A study on presence quality and cybersickness in 2D, smartphone, and VR

2022

KSII TIIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent improvements in technology have increased the consumption of virtual reality (VR) contents on immersive displays. The VR experience depends on the type of displays as well as the quality of VR contents. However, research on the impacts of VR content quality on VR experience and comparisons among different types of immersive display devices are lacking. In this study, VR contents created with our VR framework, are provided to participants on conventional two-dimensional (2D) immersive displays and VR headset. The geometric alignment of VR contents is improved with the addition of two calibration modes (i.e. preprocessing and straightening). The subjective feelings of presence and cybersickness experienced by participants while consuming VR contents created by our framework and commercial solutions are recorded in the form of questionnaires. The results of this study indicate that the improvements in VR quality lead to a better presence and less cybersickness in both conventional 2D displays and VR headset. Furthermore, the level of presence and cybersickness increases in VR headsets as compared to conventional 2D displays. Finally, the VR content quality improvements lead to a better VR experience for our VR framework as compared to commercial solutions.

show abstract

Section: Virtual Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Vr Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Impact Of Vr Content Quality and Display Devices On Presencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A study on presence quality and cybersickness in 2D, smartphone, and VR

2022

KSII TIIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Q4, only a single method applied both a lab-based and remote study [10]. Studies were again predominantly co-located (N=53), with 16 papers reporting on remote studies.…”

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These remote studies predominantly involved participants with access to personal equipment; with 8 methodologies reporting to use head-worn displays, and 8 desktop-based set ups. The mixed-methods study [10] employed a monitor-based set up for the lab-based elicitation, and researchers delivered google cardboard headsets to participants for the remote study. As well as using participants who owned equipment, 2 of the studies testing with HMD owners also provided some participants with headsets [23,36].…”

Section: Study Type: Remote Vs Localmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socially Distanced: Have user evaluation methods for Immersive Technologies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Spittle

Frutos-Pascual

et al. 2021

2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the emergence of COVID-19 in late 2019, there has been a significant disturbance in human-to-human interaction that has changed the way we conduct user studies in the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), especially for extended (augmented, mixed, and virtual) reality (XR). To uncover how XR research has adapted throughout the pandemic, this paper presents a review of user study methodology adaptations from a corpus of 951 papers. This corpus of papers covers CORE 2021 A* published conference submissions, from Q2 2020 through to Q1 2021 (IEEE ISMAR, ACM CHI, IEEE VR). The review highlights how methodologies were changed and reported; sparking discussions surrounding how methods should be conveyed and to what extent research should be contextualised, by drawing on external topical factors such as COVID-19, to maximise usefulness and perspective for future studies. We provide a set of initial guidelines based on our findings, posing key considerations for researchers when reporting on user studies during uncertain and unprecedented times.

show abstract