2014
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.974541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gestational age and fetal growth assessment among obstetricians

Abstract: The role of ultrasound in gestational age assessment and use of EFW use for FGR classification was disparate among participants. EFW and respective centiles may be over relied upon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 6 shows the 10th and 90th centiles across some widely used tables in Portugal (Hadlock's and Lubchenco's) [4], a table from a large United States sample from Alexander et al [16] and an international standard-Intergrowth (only 33-42 weeks) [17]. Of note the wide disparity with Alexander's and Lubchenco data, as well as the proximity with data from Hadlock's and Intergrowth newborn data, and the subtle differences with Yudkin's.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 6 shows the 10th and 90th centiles across some widely used tables in Portugal (Hadlock's and Lubchenco's) [4], a table from a large United States sample from Alexander et al [16] and an international standard-Intergrowth (only 33-42 weeks) [17]. Of note the wide disparity with Alexander's and Lubchenco data, as well as the proximity with data from Hadlock's and Intergrowth newborn data, and the subtle differences with Yudkin's.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we compare the 3rd and 97th centiles at 40 weeks (Fig. 5) for boys, a non-ultrasound dated chart widely used in the country [4] (Yudkin's [12]) ranges 1780 g between these centiles, while the current series ranges 1510 g, which more closely resembles Intergrowth's [17] range of 1580 g (also ultrasound dated). The narrower range is caused by precise dates which limit a large source of random variability [19], but also the geographically, socially and ethnically homogenous Portuguese population, compared with intergrowth's [17] sample.…”
Section: Current Seriesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Six relevant articles have been identified including the Delphi consensus on definition of FGR: (((((SGA [Title/Abstract]) OR ("fetal growth" [Title/Abstract]) OR (IUGR [Title/Abstract]) OR ("growth restriction" [Title/Abstract]) OR "fetal hypotrophy" [Title/Abstract]))) AND (practice survey)). A summary of those articles is found in the Appendix to this article [2,8,9,[12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A short anonymized semi-structured questionnaire was constructed for this purpose based on similar surveys performed in Portugal and Germany [8,9]. Both countries at the time of study also did not have national guidelines regarding growth assessment, making comparisons easier once data collected.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%