2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-021-01035-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geschlossene Reposition und minimal-invasive Fixation einer sakralen Ausbruchfraktur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Severe skin complications and wound infections with need for operative revision range between 4 and 50% [ 40 44 ]. Patients with a combination of procedures (e.g., SPS and TSB) showed significantly better stability of the osteosynthesis and a better rehabilitation outcome [ 6 , 19 , 22 , 40 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Severe skin complications and wound infections with need for operative revision range between 4 and 50% [ 40 44 ]. Patients with a combination of procedures (e.g., SPS and TSB) showed significantly better stability of the osteosynthesis and a better rehabilitation outcome [ 6 , 19 , 22 , 40 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture reduction was performed prior to implantation in a closed technique whenever possible [ 6 ]. For anatomical reduction and temporary retention, K-wires or reduction forceps may be used.…”
Section: Patients Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, traditional open reduction surgery leads to high incidence of complications, which seriously 5 Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine affects the postoperative recovery of patients. The minimally invasive approach technique is widely applied in clinical practice [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%