2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41533-016-0010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GESAP trial rationale and methodology: management of patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea in primary care units compared to sleep units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, two Spanish studies, PASHOS and GESAP, studied a program of the PHC system and a sleep unit for OSAS management. Although the protocol that both studies followed was similar to ours, PSG was not used as the standard test for OSAS diagnosis, and the upper age range was much larger in both studies than in our study [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, two Spanish studies, PASHOS and GESAP, studied a program of the PHC system and a sleep unit for OSAS management. Although the protocol that both studies followed was similar to ours, PSG was not used as the standard test for OSAS diagnosis, and the upper age range was much larger in both studies than in our study [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The methodology of the study has been published previously 14. In this multicentre, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, prospective, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial, patients were consecutively recruited from 11 PC units during visits for suspected OSA (chronic snoring, apnoea and/or excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS)) or resistant hypertension (defined as blood pressure (BP) higher than the therapeutic goals (ie, average systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg, average diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg or both) despite the concurrent use of at least three antihypertensive agents prescribed at doses that provide optimal benefit, with one of these drugs ideally being a diuretic agent 15.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%