2021
DOI: 10.48095/ccko202126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Germline mutations in RAD51C and RAD51D and hereditary predisposition to ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an isogenic glioma cell line, in which XRCC3 was downregulated by interference RNA, they demonstrated its importance as a possible target for therapeutic intervention [55]. Other studies have reported the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the XRCC3 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma [56]. In the current research, we proved that PAC induces RAD51D only in MDA-MB-231 cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Using an isogenic glioma cell line, in which XRCC3 was downregulated by interference RNA, they demonstrated its importance as a possible target for therapeutic intervention [55]. Other studies have reported the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the XRCC3 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma [56]. In the current research, we proved that PAC induces RAD51D only in MDA-MB-231 cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The unintended mutations in RAD51D/MDM2/MAPK genes could have compromised the therapeutic effect of targeting BRCA1/TP53/RAS as they could activate RAD51D/ inactivate MDM2/activate MAPK, leading to the promotion of cancer growth [ 233 ]. The frequent findings of unintended mutations in undesirable site genes in these studies highlight the significant risk of non-selective site effects associated with CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing [ 234 ]. The research should analyze and compare the off-target effects observed when targeting different genes, which could provide insights into the gene-specific effects of CRISPR-Cas9 [ 235 , 236 ].…”
Section: Safety and Delivery Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequent findings of unintended mutations in undesirable site genes in these studies highlight the significant risk of non-selective site effects associated with CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing [234]. The research should analyze and compare the off-target effects observed when targeting different genes, which could provide insights into the gene-specific effects of CRISPR-Cas9 [235,236].…”
Section: Delivery Challenges and Safety Measures In Crispr-based Gene...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 was highlighted in several studies (Guo et al, 2019 ) including one from the Czech Republic that suggested to add both RAD51C and RAD51D to the list of genes tested (Soukupová et al, 2021 ). In another review that summarized published studies, Pietragalla et al showed that genes like TP53 in Li‐Fraumeni syndrome, STK11 in Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome, the mismatch repair genes in Lynch syndrome, CHEK2, RAD51, BRIP1 , and PALB2 are frequent enough to be added to the panel of tested genes (Pietragalla et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%