German ambulatory care physicians' perspectives on clinical guidelines – a national survey

Abstract

BackgroundThere has been little systematic research about the extent to which German physicians accept or reject the concept and practice ofa) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) andb) evidence based medicine (EBM)The aim of this study was to investigate German office-based physicians' perspective on CPGs and EBM and their application in medical practice.MethodsStructured national telephone survey of ambulatory care physicians, four thematic blocks with 21 questions (5 point Likert scale). 511 office-based general practitioners and specialists. Main outcome measures were the application of Clinical Practice Guidelines in daily practice, preference for sources of guidelines and degree of knowledge and acceptance of EBM. In the data analysis Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for explorative analysis of correlations. The comparison of groups was performed by Student's t-test. Chi2 test was used to investigate distribution of two or more categorical variables.ResultsOf the total study population 55.3% of physicians reported already using guidelines in the treatment of patients. Physicians in group practices (GrP) as well as general practitioners (GP) agreed significantly more with the usefulness of guidelines as a basis for patient care than doctors in single practices (SP) or specialists (S) (Student's t-test mean GP 2.57, S 2.84, p < 0.01; mean GrP 2.55, SP 2.80, p < 0.05). 33.1% of the participants demonstrated a strong rejection to the application of guidelines in patient care. Acceptance of guidelines from a governmental institution was substantially lower than from physician networks or medical societies (36.2% vs. 53.4% vs. 62.0%). 73.8% of doctors interpret EBM as a combination of scientific research and individual medical knowledge; 80% regard EBM as the best basis for patient care.ConclusionDespite a majority of physicians accepting and applying CPGs a large group remains that is critical and opposed to the utilization of CPGs in daily practice and to the concept of EBM in general. Doctors in single practice and specialists appear to be more critical than physicians in group practices and GPs. Future research is needed to evaluate the willingness to acquire necessary knowledge and skills for the promotion and routine application of CPGs.

Awareness and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Parkinson’s Disease among German Neurologists

“…While initial studies are available for general practitioners and internal medicine specialists [20,21,22], our study is the first evaluation of a clinical practice guideline in Neurology in Germany. The focus was on collecting initial experience on the awareness of the guideline on PD and related disorders in everyday medical practice 3 years after its first dissemination.…”

Patient-based medicine: aligning patients’ perspectives on disease and treatment with evidence-based medicine criteria

“…It was found that a large group of GPs is critical and opposed to utilization of clinical practice guidelines in daily practice as well as to the concept of EBM in general (Butzlaff et al 2006).…”

Efecto de la implantación de un programa de mejora de la capacidad resolutiva de atención primaria en la adecuación y la demora de las exploraciones endoscópicas

“…De todos modos, su utilidad práctica es controvertida. En encuestas realizadas a médicos de AP en Alemania, hasta un 33% de los facultativos rechazaba su aplicación en el cuidado de pacientes 19 . En un estudio con grupos focales en médicos de AP en nuestro medio, los facultativos muestran una actitud positiva hacia la MBE pero la aplicación en la práctica diaria es escasa, especialmente en relación con la falta de tiempo y la presión asistencial 20 .…”