GERG round-robin test of Z-meters, a Burnett apparatus, and an interferometric device for pVT measurements

Jaeschke, M.; Audibert, Serge; Caneghem, P. van; Humphreys, A. E.; Rosmalen, R. Janssen–van; Pellei, Quinto

doi:10.1007/bf00503867

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Goodwin 54 used such a method, which he called a ''gasometer'' to determine the quantity of sample in his isochoric instrument. A similar approach has been applied in a commercial instrument termed a ''Z-meter,'' [where ''Z'' refers to the compression factor Z ¼ p/(RTr)]; see, for example, Jaeschke et al 66 …”

Section: Expansion Techniques (Burnett Method)mentioning

confidence: 97%

CHAPTER 2. Experimental Techniques 1: Direct Methods

McLinden¹

2014

Volume Properties

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Expansion Techniques (Burnett Method)mentioning

confidence: 97%

CHAPTER 2. Experimental Techniques 1: Direct Methods

McLinden¹

2014

Volume Properties

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…RRT shall be performed to compare the three strategies, given it is a matter of performing a systematic study comparing quantification methods, as done by Castellote [2,4,8,9,11].…”

Section: Comparison Of the Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Questions need be answered so that the researcher is fully advised when opting for specific strategy. The comparison between the three strategies regarding accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility shall be established by means of Round Robin Tests (RRT), used by several authors [2,4,8,9,11] as an important instrument of external quality control used to determine and/or verify the accuracy of measuring methods, enabling to determine a level of agreement between different methodologies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison between occupational noise measurement strategies: why is it important?

Costa

Arezes

2012

Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The international standard ISO 9612:2009, regarding the determination of occupational noise exposure through an engineering method, establishes a methodology for evaluating the exposure of workers to occupational noise, through the specification of three different strategies, namely: task-based measurement (TBM); job-based measurement (JBM) and; fullday measurement (FDM). In this work, questions are raised,«resulting in a literature review regarding the need to test the functionality of the three strategies, through the systematic comparison between them and analysis of their application impact at several levels. There is a need to test the compare these three strategies, since there are no peer-review studies in this domain. In fact, there are still no studies that systematically do the comparison between them and analyze the impact of their application at various levels, such as the precision and accuracy of the results, the required equipment, time spent and, most important, the estimation of the uncertainty associated to the measurements.

show abstract