Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation

Abstract

The application of brand theory to destinations has grown in the last few decades, with the destination brand personality being a viable metaphor for creating and positioning destination brands. An often-overlooked tourism typology is geotourism; more specifically, volcanic tourism, since it can be a passive element of any tourism form or active nature tourism. However, its potential is relatively unexplored in terms of online branding. For this reason, the present study analyzes online brand image co-creation, using 300 websites related to three unique volcanic tourism destinations—Iceland, the Azores, and the Canary Islands. Three different types of sources (destination marketing organizations, commercial, and editorial websites) created these contents. The results demonstrate significant differences between the communication of the three destinations, with Iceland, where there is less aligned communication, most valuing geo elements in their communication, and the Azores, where all stakeholders communicate similar brand personality traits, displaying more aligned communication regarding brand personality. In the Canary Islands geotourism is less explored as a destination offer and is consequently less communicated. Acknowledging the different brand positioning and the parity and differentiation points among destinations with the same baseline offer—volcanic tourism—can be helpful for destination brand managers to reignite tourism and promote a unique tourism experience.

Research on Online Destination Image of Zhenjiang Section of the Grand Canal Based on Network Content Analysis

“…With the development of the times, some of the heritages are reborn and some disappear, and the role and orientation of the ZGC are changing. "The image of the past" can come from knowledge, such as history and allusions, or from marketing behaviors, such as metaphor [20,50]. Functional, symbolic, experiential association and the attitude to overall brand are identified as the key brand image associations of heritage destinations [51].…”

Exploring the Drivers of Bank Loyalty in a Digitized World

“…In the literature (Rather & Sharma, 2017;Tiago et al, 2021), engagement is defined as a concept that propels a person toward a brand. On the other hand, brand experience is about the sensitivity, behavior, cognition, and feelings triggered by brand communication.…”

“…This is because compared to consumer engagement, direct experience with the brand may not be a reinforcement. Brand experience is not considered an emotional relationship like customer engagement (Rather & Sharma, 2017;Tiago et al, 2021). In explaining the relationship between these concepts, the research suggests that brand engagement can influence the brand experience (Hollebeek, 2011a).…”

Urban Geotourism: Governance in the New Normal

“…The implementation of tourism governance can be through digital innovation to overcome social restrictions known as smart tourism (Lee et al, 2020). Meanwhile, in geotourism destinations, the use of digital media in creating destination brands during the pandemic plays an important role through co-creation with stakeholders (Tiago et al, 2021).…”