2002
DOI: 10.5194/smsps-3-29-2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geothermics of the Pannonian basin and its bearing on the neotectonics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
201
3
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(39 reference statements)
20
201
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…this map was calculated by taking into account the present-day depth to the pre-Neogene basement and the heat flow, assuming an initial crustal thickness of 35 km. Lenkey (1999) derived the depth to the pre-Neogene basement from the isopach map of the Neogene sediments in the Pannonian basin that was published by Horváth and royden (1981). We also implemented the fault pattern in the Pannonian basin as given by Horváth (1993) and Horváth et al (2006).…”
Section: Estimating the Magnitude Of Extension In The Pannonian Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…this map was calculated by taking into account the present-day depth to the pre-Neogene basement and the heat flow, assuming an initial crustal thickness of 35 km. Lenkey (1999) derived the depth to the pre-Neogene basement from the isopach map of the Neogene sediments in the Pannonian basin that was published by Horváth and royden (1981). We also implemented the fault pattern in the Pannonian basin as given by Horváth (1993) and Horváth et al (2006).…”
Section: Estimating the Magnitude Of Extension In The Pannonian Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We subdivided these transects at their intersection points with normal faults into several segments i, which are characterised by variable crustal thinning factors. For each transect segment we estimated the magnitude of extension as follows: (1) where l 0 is the initial length of a segment prior to extension, l 1 its present-day length after extension and δ the crustal thinning factor as given by Lenkey (1999). Once l 0 was obtained for each transect segment, the magnitude of extension dl (length change) along each segment could be estimated:…”
Section: Estimating the Magnitude Of Extension In The Pannonian Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data can be altered during each modelling step so the modelled temperature and vitrinite re ectance (VR) correspond to the actual ones in the wells. Heat ow was set at a 70 mW/m as shown in [20]. SWIT was determined from regional values from [21] and PWD was set according to the reconstructions in [5] in the range from 0 m (recent) to 50 m regarding environments that existed for deposition of members of the Lonja Formation.…”
Section: Basin Modelling -Data Processing and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%