2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geothermal development associated with enhanced hydrocarbon recovery and geological CO2 storage in oil and gas fields in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, low individual well flow rates were observed from three main formations: Bakken (3.8 kg/s), Madison (5.63 kg/s), and Red River (8.76 kg/s) were observed in Williston basin (USA) . Particularly, the flow pattern in Bakken field located in shale rock system with nanoscale pore structure exhibits capillary fingering regime . For CO 2 geological storage, low viscosity CO 2 was injected to brine at a low flow rate of 0.04 mL/min corresponding to viscosity ratio M = 0.03 and capillary number Ca = 1.8 × 10 –8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, low individual well flow rates were observed from three main formations: Bakken (3.8 kg/s), Madison (5.63 kg/s), and Red River (8.76 kg/s) were observed in Williston basin (USA) . Particularly, the flow pattern in Bakken field located in shale rock system with nanoscale pore structure exhibits capillary fingering regime . For CO 2 geological storage, low viscosity CO 2 was injected to brine at a low flow rate of 0.04 mL/min corresponding to viscosity ratio M = 0.03 and capillary number Ca = 1.8 × 10 –8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Particularly, the flow pattern in Bakken field located in shale rock system with nanoscale pore structure exhibits capillary fingering regime. 74 For CO 2 geological storage, low viscosity CO 2 was injected to brine at a low flow rate of 0.04 mL/min corresponding to viscosity ratio M = 0.03 and capillary number Ca = 1.8 × 10 −8 . 75 Afterward, the residual CO 2 was displaced by brine with M = 32.82 and Ca = 6 × 10 −7 .…”
Section: Energymentioning
confidence: 99%