2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-020-01111-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical properties of 3D-printed transparent granular soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By adjusting the particle size of fused quartz and the mass ratio of silica powder, the stress-strain curves of TCS match those of natural clay. (2) Compared with several existing typical transparent geomaterials, such as transparent granular soil (Li et al, 2020), TCS (Wei et al, 2019), transparent glass soil (Kong and Lu, 2014), transparent glass sand (Kong et al, 2013) and Transparent silica gel (Iskander et al, 2002b) used in model tests, the TCS prepared in the present work has a similar stress-strain relationship to them. The difference is that the stress-strain curves of TCS used in this research can be controlled across a wider range, thus TCS has stronger applicability in simulating different natural clays.…”
Section: Application Of Tcs As the Substitute For Claymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…By adjusting the particle size of fused quartz and the mass ratio of silica powder, the stress-strain curves of TCS match those of natural clay. (2) Compared with several existing typical transparent geomaterials, such as transparent granular soil (Li et al, 2020), TCS (Wei et al, 2019), transparent glass soil (Kong and Lu, 2014), transparent glass sand (Kong et al, 2013) and Transparent silica gel (Iskander et al, 2002b) used in model tests, the TCS prepared in the present work has a similar stress-strain relationship to them. The difference is that the stress-strain curves of TCS used in this research can be controlled across a wider range, thus TCS has stronger applicability in simulating different natural clays.…”
Section: Application Of Tcs As the Substitute For Claymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Conducting indoor model experiments using transparentsoil material [3][4][5][6] in combination with particle image velocimetry technology enables the deformation and evolution process within the soil to be observed [7][8][9][10]. Many scholars use transparent soil to study the stability of slopes [11,12], the shear deformation of soil [13], and the surface uplift in model experiments [14]. Preliminary studies indicate that transparent soil prepared using fused quartz sand as the soil framework [15], aerosol silica powder as the binder, and mixed mineral oil as the pore fluid exhibits mechanical characteristics that are similar to clay; it can therefore be used to create physically complex models [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of 3DP technology in large‐scale physical model tests can solve some puzzling geotechnical and geomechanical issues, and also realize complex geological structures (Feng et al, 2019). In geotechnical engineering, many 3DP solutions are highly recommendable, such as 3D printed transparent granular soil (Y. Li et al, 2021), 3D printed small model geogrids (Stathas et al, 2017), tunnel physical model fabrication (L. Song et al, 2018), and rock‐like geological materials (Vogler et al, 2017). 3DP can provide quantitative stability evaluation for geotechnical engineering cases (Q. Jiang et al, 2021) as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geotechnical engineering, many 3DP solutions are highly recommendable, such as 3D printed transparent granular soil (Y. Li et al, 2021), 3D printed small model geogrids (Stathas et al, 2017), tunnel physical model fabrication (L. Song et al, 2018), and rock-like geological materials (Vogler et al, 2017). 3DP can provide quantitative stability evaluation for geotechnical engineering cases (Q.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%