2012
DOI: 10.5030/jcigsjournal.27.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geosynthetic Clay Liner Permeated with Acid Rock Drainage:The Role of Iron in Arsenic Immobilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore arsenic, an oxyanion, cannot be sorbed by GCLs. Previous studies by the authors have shown that great amount of As was retained into GCLs mainly due to the high concentration of Fe present in ARD (Naka et al, 2012), and Lange et al (2007) proposed an hypothesis of As retention due to the gypsum precipitation observed in XRD analysis after ARD permeation through GCLs. Abollino et al (2003) reported that at pH < 3.5 metals are adsorbed on Na-montmorillonite following the order: Cu 2+ < Pb 2+ < Cd 2+ < Zn 2+ < Mn 2+ = Cr 3+ = Ni 2+ .…”
Section: Effects Of Type Of Metalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore arsenic, an oxyanion, cannot be sorbed by GCLs. Previous studies by the authors have shown that great amount of As was retained into GCLs mainly due to the high concentration of Fe present in ARD (Naka et al, 2012), and Lange et al (2007) proposed an hypothesis of As retention due to the gypsum precipitation observed in XRD analysis after ARD permeation through GCLs. Abollino et al (2003) reported that at pH < 3.5 metals are adsorbed on Na-montmorillonite following the order: Cu 2+ < Pb 2+ < Cd 2+ < Zn 2+ < Mn 2+ = Cr 3+ = Ni 2+ .…”
Section: Effects Of Type Of Metalmentioning
confidence: 99%