2013
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2013.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical techniques for approximate location of pipe burst events in water distribution systems

Abstract: This paper focusses on the customisation and further enhancement of the recently developed data-driven methodology for the automated near real-time detection of pipe bursts and other (e.g. sensor faults) events at the district metered area (DMA) level. Assuming the availability of pressure/flow data from an increased number of sensors deployed in a DMA, the aim is to: (i) overcome the limitations of the probabilistic inference engine when dealing with the increased data availability; and (ii) exploit the event… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach based on an inverse approach that formulates the leak detection and localization problem as a parameter estimation approach was presented by Pudar & Ligget (1992) and further inverse approaches were investigated (Ligget & Chen, 1995) (Kapelan et al, 2003) (Wu & Sage, 2006). Additionally, other contributions integrating data-driven and model-driven approaches (Farley et al, 2010;Bicik et al, 2013) or based just on a data-driven approach (Romano et al, 2013) were also presented. Pérez et al (2011) presents a direct modelling methodology developed to help network operators deal with the detection and localization of leaks in district metered areas (DMAs 5 ) of water distribution networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach based on an inverse approach that formulates the leak detection and localization problem as a parameter estimation approach was presented by Pudar & Ligget (1992) and further inverse approaches were investigated (Ligget & Chen, 1995) (Kapelan et al, 2003) (Wu & Sage, 2006). Additionally, other contributions integrating data-driven and model-driven approaches (Farley et al, 2010;Bicik et al, 2013) or based just on a data-driven approach (Romano et al, 2013) were also presented. Pérez et al (2011) presents a direct modelling methodology developed to help network operators deal with the detection and localization of leaks in district metered areas (DMAs 5 ) of water distribution networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leakage awareness focuses on leakage detection in the network [(Kapelan et al 2003); ; ; (Palau et al 2012); (Romano et al 2014)], but does not give any information about its precise location. On the other hand, leakage localization (Romano et al 2013) is an activity that identifies and prioritizes the areas of leakage to make pinpointing of leaks easier. Leak localization techniques can be divided into two categories: external and internal (ADEC 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What can reduce a number of damages is skilful management of a water supply system and proper maintenance. It is, however, impossible to entirely eliminate such incidents as, most often, they occur randomly [5,7,24]. They can result in financial and social losses [7,8,25,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%