2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7061(01)00067-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
285
0
18

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 491 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
285
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation algorithms instead of kriging methods were selected to achieve the goal, although the application of kriging methods essentially met the need. The reason lies in the advantages of simulation over kriging, the most notable was that a set of realizations generated by simulation allow one to model the spatial uncertainty and study the propagation of uncertainty by considering many locations simultaneously rather than one at a time (Goovaerts 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation algorithms instead of kriging methods were selected to achieve the goal, although the application of kriging methods essentially met the need. The reason lies in the advantages of simulation over kriging, the most notable was that a set of realizations generated by simulation allow one to model the spatial uncertainty and study the propagation of uncertainty by considering many locations simultaneously rather than one at a time (Goovaerts 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology proposed by Deutsch (1997) and Goovaerts (2001) was used to assess the local uncertainty by examining the performance of the reproduction of conditional cumulative distribution function (ccdf). At any validation location u i , a series of symmetric p-probability intervals (PI) bounded by the (1 − p)/2 and (1 + p)/2 quantiles can be calculated from the knowledge of the ccdf F(u i ; z|(n)).…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for soil sand content is a 10 km by 10 km raster data set constructed from soil profiles via spatial interpolation (Oberthür et al, 1999;Shi et al, 2004Shi et al, , 2006. Although a certain proportion of the immense spatial variation in soil properties may be lost after spatial interpolation (Goovaerts, 2001;van Bodegom et al, 2002), the gridded soil data are still the most detailed of the five model inputs. In descending order of data abundance, the other four factors are GY, OM, W ptn and VI.…”
Section: Pdfs Of the Model Input Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its effectiveness relies on the accuracy of the interpolation method used to define the spatial variability of soil properties (Goovaerts 1998;1999;2001). The variogram is a mathematical description of the relationship (or structure) between the variance of pairs of observations (or data points) and the distance separating these observations (h) (Olea 1991).…”
Section: Geostatistical Optimization Of the Spatial Interpolation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%